|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 17th, 2010, 07:04 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Satellite Beach, Fl
Posts: 784
|
House season finale -- Just watched it!
The season finally of House. It was incredible and any one who says it can't be done now, clearly has not seen what has been done. Beautiful shots and my wife who is a fan of the show and not a fan of geeky video things loved it. SO, the fan in my house just saw a great show and didn't even notice what it was shot with.
|
May 17th, 2010, 07:26 PM | #2 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 11
|
That's what its all about. We can all argue specs and issues, but it's the story and how its presented. Great season finale. So, being a House fan and a geek, I loved it.
|
May 17th, 2010, 07:40 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 126
|
Looked good and a good episode although I don't watch House much. Did think a few shots were too shallow (see ending focused on House in Bathroom) but that's my 2 cents! Compression held up well on Directv.
|
May 17th, 2010, 07:40 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 338
|
That was fantastic, to a normal viewer they will never guess what camera this was shot in.
I am curious if they choose the 5D for this final episode of the tight areas( crawl space) which makes the 5D perfect for !
__________________
Dragonfly Production http://www.dragonflyproduction.net/ http://www.vimeo.com/user432181 |
May 17th, 2010, 07:49 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 581
|
Good to see a few focus lags - It's not just me but they also used them artistically in places too. I must say that's the first House episode I ever watched.
__________________
Nashville TN using Canon 5D MK3, Canon 550D, RODE SVM mic, 70-200 f2.8L II IS, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 and 85 f/1.8, Vegas Pro 11, Zoom H4n, Blackbird, Lilliput Monitor, Lightroom |
May 17th, 2010, 08:00 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 170
|
I do think that was one of the main--if not the main--reason for using the 5DMII.
|
May 17th, 2010, 08:03 PM | #7 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Beverly, MA
Posts: 23
|
Loved it!
The mood, lighting and intimacy was just perfect. Couldn't have done it with any other system. My hats off to the Director of photography and all the crew to making this work.
|
May 17th, 2010, 08:07 PM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Satellite Beach, Fl
Posts: 784
|
Quote:
I really liked those shots and thought they worked great for the mood.... Just goes to show everyone has an opinion and in this case we are both right. |
|
May 17th, 2010, 11:24 PM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,065
|
"House," which may be Fox's biggest show behind "Idol" can afford to use whatever set-up they want (including 35 mm film).
So that they'd use an off-the-shelf DLSR camera is news in its self. That it looked so good (and I loved that bathroom shot BTW) is nothing short of amazing. I was taught to shoot film, well, on film 20 years ago. If back then you'd tell me that a digital still camera would be able to shoot 24p 35mm quality footage, I'd have laughed in your face. Might as well tell me you had a time machine. Simply amazing. As a side note, I own a T2 and have been prodding my wife about upgrading to the Mark II. Tonight's ep (she loves House) may have pushed her over the edge! john |
May 17th, 2010, 11:48 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 249
|
oh man, i thought that looked great!
watched in hd and was really impressed. hats off to the house crew, they really nailed it. |
May 18th, 2010, 01:16 AM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 205
|
Quote:
|
|
May 18th, 2010, 07:34 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 842
|
I don't think you could have gotten quite as narrow a field of focus with a T2i as they did in some of those shots. Some of those were crazy!
The episode looked fantastic, no question. Now I find myself wishing they'd made a behind the scenes video of the making of this episode. I do wish there had been more hospital shots, I liked seeing the 5D footage in the environments we're used to seeing for comparison sake. My wife is a huge House fan and she hasn't watched it yet, I plan to ask her if she thought anything looked or felt different about this show. I'm wondering if the thin focus will stand out to her of if she'll even notice. |
May 18th, 2010, 09:23 AM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 706
|
I didn't think it handled skin quite as well as the high-end cameras (film or digital). But overall, very nice. I didn't see any objectionable technical flaws at all. I was mostly enjoying the show.
|
May 18th, 2010, 09:48 AM | #14 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,267
|
I thought overall it looked great although there were more than a few shots which looked softer than usual for a show. During the middle of the show I suspected they were using something other than the 5D so it will be interesting to find out if they intercut with anything else. The end scene in the bathroom did feel more 5Dish than other parts of the show. Did they actually use the H264 recording or did they record to something else?
|
May 18th, 2010, 09:51 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 842
|
What else could they have recorded to? You still can't get a useable HDMI signal out without cropping, right?
|
| ||||||
|
|