|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 14th, 2010, 07:08 AM | #1 |
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2
|
"Vintage-warm-retro" video: Which lense?
I am planning to buy a 5d mark II and intend to use it for filming music videos.
I am sooooo confused on the lense selection... The Canon lenses videos look great: Vivid and sharp but I really loved the Lomo anamorphic videos, they looked like a great independent-vintage looking production. I am having a hard time finding Lomo lenses and all the conversion tools, pfffff... Which current produstion lenses would you use for that "real-film-retro-quality" on a 5d mark II? What about Nikon or Leica lenses? |
April 14th, 2010, 08:19 AM | #2 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Quote:
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
|
April 14th, 2010, 08:21 AM | #3 |
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2
|
Sounds interesting... I am thinking about a 50mm lense to start with. Any ideas on their compatibility with the 5d?
|
April 14th, 2010, 08:42 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 795
|
Hi Mark
I would go for the Nikon too. Take a look at this thread: http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eo...non-5dmk2.html
__________________
http://www.gooderick.com |
April 14th, 2010, 11:10 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
A great inexpensive lens in the short telephoto/portrait format is the Nikon Series E 100mm, F2.8. It is compact, light weight. Back when I first got the camera, I tested it here, shooting hand held. See below. I think this is as long as you want to go hand held.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
April 17th, 2010, 02:31 AM | #6 |
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Thailand
Posts: 14
|
Here's something I did with a nikon ai 50mm 1:1.2. I think the crowd shots are wide open and the stage stuff is at about f/2.0-4
YouTube - Ga-Pi - Original Thai Rasta (Live) Official Video Liam |
April 17th, 2010, 03:42 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 217
|
isnt the 'lomo effect' something that would be created in post rather than by the lens choice?? (lots of saturation, vignette etc..?)
|
April 17th, 2010, 06:51 AM | #8 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Laval, France
Posts: 11
|
if you want vintage retro looking results, maybe using vintage retro lenses in the first place might help.
post production is nice but the optical stage is really important too so check your 2nd hand shop & look around for some cheap glass from the seventies... here's a little example done using just older russian glass and a few old M42 japanese too... |
April 26th, 2010, 07:51 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 317
|
Here is a bit of retro / vintage / nostalgia
Straight from the camera and shot with the plastic Minolta MD Zoom 28-70mm. No external grading but "WB SHIFT/BKT" set at "B5,G5/+-0" or an old Sigma 50mm 2.8 Macro |
April 30th, 2010, 03:27 AM | #10 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
__________________
dcrin3.com we don't know alot of genres, at least as of now. |
|
April 30th, 2010, 06:53 AM | #11 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Yes gents, none of this makes any sense unless you are forthcoming about any effects, either in-camera or in post, that are applied to the footage. James' notes about the color adjustments are a good start. Otherwise you may inspire someone to go and seek the lenses you are describing and end up disappointed that they can't reproduce the same look in-camera.
I've shot music videos completely clean on modern lenses and seen them manipulated in post to the point where it would be anyone's guess what we used (like this one).
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
April 30th, 2010, 07:36 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Neenah, WI
Posts: 547
|
I'm with Charles on this one...shooting as clean as possible is the best strategy.
What I see in most of the shots that are pointed out to me as 'retro' can be done in post easily... Milky black levels, some obvious grain...all the defective film tracking through the projector traits if that trips your trigger...glare that seems to indicate that polarizers and matte boxes weren't invented yet... The advantage to having a clean plate to begin with is that you gain the ability to work in post with much more nuance and apply slightly different settings to different shots to achieve constant results.
__________________
TimK Kolb Productions |
May 2nd, 2010, 11:20 AM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 317
|
Yeah, but wheres the fun in that.
Sure you can shoot clean but you won't get that spontaneous creative look of that of a clean recording. Of course you can add this in post but it will never feel quite the same. It may not be your job to interpret the emotional feeling in a shot and with these limitations the safety of shooting clean has to happen most of the time, but outside a commercial world thats a different story. I find myself recording creative shots and clean shots, but tend to always pick the retro style shots in post or at least have more pleasure viewing them. I suppose beauty is in the eye of the beholder and whilst my retro look gives me the same emotional feeling as looking back on my childhood 8mm films, my sons retro look might well be that of a VHS / DV look. It's the current trend at the moment well at least here in the UK as half of all the adverts broadcast have lots lens flare blue/green blacks, yellow whites and shallow dop. My current favorite advert is the John Lewis "Always a Woman" YouTube - John Lewis TV Ad Never Knowingly Undersold / Blink Productions - View Dougal Wilson Work I have had so much fun with old lenses and odd filters left over from yesteryear, heck on the clip "Reflections of Light" the lens isn't even attached to the body. What ever works for you, it doesn't have to cost much. Last edited by James Miller; May 3rd, 2010 at 12:40 AM. Reason: addition |
May 5th, 2010, 06:53 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 217
|
i think use of filters is definitely a way to get a vintage look..
seemed like (as charles said) there was a little confusion that using old manual lenses alone will give you some of these more extreme results related to saturation, gamma and colour balance (ive never heard of any lenses that can do that..) Last edited by Manus Sweeney; May 5th, 2010 at 07:43 AM. |
May 5th, 2010, 08:50 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 706
|
|
| ||||||
|
|