|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 22nd, 2010, 10:05 AM | #76 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 218
|
133X is now too slow
Well, I can report that my Kingston 32GB 133x cards I've been using since day one are no longer able to keep up. My guess is it's because of the uptick in data rate with the new firmware. To save $ I went with slower cards and never had any problems. I compared them head to head with UDMA and saw no difference in image quality at all - though obviously a big difference in speed.
But now after seeing the buffer fill up completely and an instant later have the camera stop recording, I'm retiring the 133x cards and moving up to 300X. Can't complain about this amazing firmware though.
__________________
Canon 5D Mark II || L-Series Lenses || Steadicam Pilot || Final Cut Studio www.lovestorymedia.com |
March 22nd, 2010, 10:16 AM | #77 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 1,589
|
Erik, one of my cards is a Kingston 16GB 133X and I've not noticed any difference before or after the firmware update in terms of CF performance. My 32GB cards are mainly 400X Transcend CF, but even though they are of course faster speeds I've not noticed any problems in 5D performance swapping and changing with the Kingston.
|
March 22nd, 2010, 11:02 AM | #78 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 218
|
We had cameras fill the buffer and stop recording several times yesterday, first shoot with the new firmware, having never had a problem before on our seven 133x cards. We shot for hours and really gave the cards a workout, and they failed too often. These are no longer an acceptable speed for the 5D IMO.
__________________
Canon 5D Mark II || L-Series Lenses || Steadicam Pilot || Final Cut Studio www.lovestorymedia.com |
March 22nd, 2010, 11:47 AM | #79 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Knokke-Heist, Belgium
Posts: 963
|
That's strange; everything works fine with my 16 gigabyte, 133x Transcend cards...
|
March 23rd, 2010, 11:30 PM | #80 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,531
|
|
March 24th, 2010, 05:57 AM | #81 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 26
|
Erik.
I updated my 5D yesterday and tried with my Kingston 16GB 133x. No problems detected, I recorded a 7 minute video with no interruption. Tomeu Santandreu |
March 31st, 2010, 11:19 AM | #82 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lisbon-Portugal
Posts: 35
|
Erik
I have a 16 Gb Kingston elite pro 133x, that after the firmware update, start to have the same problem. it only stops once after the buffer filled up, and i got many freeze frames on the footage. |
March 31st, 2010, 11:43 AM | #83 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 218
|
Wow freeze frames. We haven't had that yet, but continue to suffer from the buffer rapidly filling up and stopping the recording. It's just an occasional occurrence, but often enough to be dangerous!
__________________
Canon 5D Mark II || L-Series Lenses || Steadicam Pilot || Final Cut Studio www.lovestorymedia.com |
April 14th, 2010, 01:33 AM | #84 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 26
|
Hi guys!
I heve noticed the problem too with my Kingston 16gb 133x. The video stopped after a few seconds of recording (3 or 4 seconds). But with the same card Im able to record longer videos (even 7 minutes). I think is a random problem if was due to the buffer you wouldn't be able to record longer videos. I remember another problem it ocurred me once was with 1.1.0 fimrware. When testing ISO 12800 I got missing frames during a pan |
September 11th, 2010, 12:19 AM | #85 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 120
|
Ok,
I just did the update to 2.0.7 on my cinematographers camera and we were doing some test shoots. It seems that everything works fine except I am a little confused. It seems that when we go into movie mode and set it up to record in 1920(24fps), the shutter speed seems to move when we adjust aperture. Are we doing something wrong? I thought that the shutter speed should be set on 24 but it looks like the lowest it will go to is 30. Can anyone clear this up for me and tell me what I am missing or at least point me in the right direction? Thanks a ton in advance. I really need to figure this out because I have to shoot this Friday. |
September 11th, 2010, 07:07 AM | #86 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 74
|
Are you set to manual? Also you need to set shutter to 1/50.
Visit: Complete Idiot’s Guide to the Canon 5d Mk II; Adobe Premiere Edition (Updated for CS5 and firmware 2.0.7) - Crooked Path Films Blog |
September 13th, 2010, 04:30 PM | #87 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 120
|
Richard,
Amazing information. You answered so many of my questions with one foul swoop. Thank you. I do have one more for you though. In your blog, you recommend to shoot 1/50 shutter speed. Will this achieve the 24fps look the best? Also, we shot in the desert all day sunday and I feel like the shutter still moves around every once in a while even though we are in manual and only adjusting stops. Any Ideas? |
| ||||||
|
|