|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 11th, 2009, 06:09 AM | #106 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Knokke-Heist, Belgium
Posts: 963
|
Quote:
|
|
December 11th, 2009, 05:04 PM | #107 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 414
|
Canon does not have high end video cam line today, or they have outdated stuff. They have glasses, you are right.
__________________
Sony XDCAM EX1r, Canon 5DMkII, Røde NTG2, Røde NT1000, Røde Stereo Videomic, Sachtler DV6 SB on Gitzo 1325V, Steadicam Merlin, Omnitracker, Hackintosh 3.5Ghz Quad 8Gb RAM |
December 11th, 2009, 05:58 PM | #108 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 542
|
But Beta isn't dead yet! LOLOLOLOLocal Neeewwwsss...
|
December 12th, 2009, 03:29 PM | #109 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
But consider the huge disparity in in total numbers - .0003x as many videos as stills. Flickr has an average of 2000 users uploading photos from the 5DmkII every day. Vimeo probably has 500 total 5DmkII users (I'm just assuming an average of 3-5 clips per user). I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that it's at least a 10:1 ratio of photo to video users.
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
|
December 12th, 2009, 05:07 PM | #110 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eureka, Ca
Posts: 29
|
What your not taking into account it the "easy" factor. I can shoot a pic and have it on flickr in about 5 minutes, and it could be a decent photo. Its WAY more work to shoot video, import it, convert it, edit it and then render it and upload it to vimeo than it is a picture. Thats why the numbers are so misleading.
|
December 12th, 2009, 06:23 PM | #111 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
Actually I am taking that into account. I would absolutely expect more photos than videos because of the ease of uploading them - that's why I say I think 10:1 is reasonable, despite the fact that the actual numbers are significantly higher.
And I'm not saying that video sales are an insignificant portion of the overall camera sales - even if it represents a 2-3% increase in sales for the camera it's important to Canon, especially if you consider that much of that 2-3% is probably also buying lenses from Canon for the first time. I just think it's really easy to spend a lot of time hanging around here and assuming that the rest of the world feels the same way about this camera as everyone here - which I don't think is the case.
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
December 12th, 2009, 07:02 PM | #112 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norwegian lost in California
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
-- peer
__________________
www.NoPEER.com |
|
December 15th, 2009, 02:25 PM | #113 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC Area.
Posts: 550
|
I know I wouldn't have bought it if it wasn't for its video capability. I also have a friend who was a nikon photographer as a hobby but video is his profession and switched over to canon for the mkII video functions and also bought lenses for video, and is going to buy flashes for his hobby, so video production really helped the sale not only of the camera, but its accessories.
__________________
Red Epic available for rent, starting at $500 per day, Scarlets, and Lenses available too. rentals.maddalenamedia.com |
January 8th, 2010, 03:51 PM | #114 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Enumclaw, WA
Posts: 58
|
Any news at all on the Canon firmware update allowing optional frame rates for video ???
|
January 9th, 2010, 05:45 PM | #115 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
I was at CES Thursday and Friday. Not a peep about the new firmware delivery dates or features.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
January 10th, 2010, 09:51 AM | #116 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norwegian lost in California
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
-- peer
__________________
www.NoPEER.com |
|
January 10th, 2010, 12:52 PM | #117 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
Man, it's going to be a happy day when they finally come through, but the wait is getting kind of excruciating.
__________________
BayTaper.com | One man's multimedia journey through the San Francisco live jazz and creative music scene. |
|
January 10th, 2010, 01:16 PM | #118 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
There's the new 70-200L II. It's said to be a bit heavier than the current model, because of an additional element. It has the new hybrid IS, including modes 1 and 2 (panning).
The real motivation for the new lens is faster focusing. Sports photographers were not happy with the 1D3. The 1D4 focusing is said to be MUCH better. I think Canon was desperate to maintain their lead in sports, so they delivered improved focus response on the 70-200 to seal the deal. We've got to wait for the firmware to ship - and NAB to arrive - before we get more information and products for pro video...
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
January 11th, 2010, 04:01 AM | #119 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eagle River, AK
Posts: 9
|
"It has the new hybrid IS, including modes 1 and 2 (panning). "
You sure about that Jon? I thought it was not the hybrid system (reserved for the 100macro). I know the V2 70-200's IS has increased to include another stop, but I don't believe they included Hybrid stabilization. Just as an fyi, the original 70-200/2.8is also has iS mode switch 1/2:) Anything at all in the Canon area that's NOT predicated on the "Consumer market?" IE, other than the ELPHs and Power Shots, is there any DSLR activity? Are they showing off the 1d4? J |
January 11th, 2010, 11:56 AM | #120 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Jeremy, you're probably right. From the Canon website: " It features a next-generation Optical Image Stabilizer, providing up to 4 stops of correction at all focal lengths." I had assumed that the "next generation Optical Image Stabilizer" was the same as the new IS in the Macro. Now that I think about it, x-y stabilization is important in a macro, but not so much in a long lens. The next gen IS is probably just faster and more precise.
One thing the CES rep mentioned is that the new lens has a 1ft shorter minimum focus distance, which is sweet (1.2m/3.94 ft. - maximum close-up magnification: 0.21x). I have the 200/2.8L and the 4.9 ft MFD can be a stretch when photographing something at your feet - and it only offers 0.16x magnification. It's nice when you can keep shooting with your long lens, rather than having to change over to a macro to get the shot.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
| ||||||
|
|