|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 6th, 2009, 07:00 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 309
|
That is my primary lens, back by a 70-200 2.8 IS for long shots, this lens really gives outstanding images, but the 24mm is totally useless when using the Fader ND. Thus being said I glued the Fader ND to my 70-200. Oh! and I use a 82mm Metal Tele -Lens Hood, since there's no way of using Canon hoods.
|
August 7th, 2009, 12:31 AM | #17 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,531
|
|
August 7th, 2009, 09:40 AM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 309
|
Quote:
I have the lens hood mounted and the vignettes was so huge, but is fine when the hood is not mounted. I will rephrase this that the 24mm is useless when using Fader ND w/lens hood mounted. |
|
August 7th, 2009, 12:09 PM | #19 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
Nigel:
I am happy to report that I barely get any vignetting with the Fader ND on the Canon 17-40 f4 L at 17mm. The vignetting is more noticeable on the screen, but it almost all occurs in the bars on the screen. I need to shoot some tests and view on a real HD screen to check the corners. At 18 or 19mm, definitely no vignetting. My first Fader ND was broken, I am waiting for Boniface to send the replacement and a 58mm version for the 70-300 f4-5.6 IS. They arrive next week. Dan |
| ||||||
|
|