|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 22nd, 2009, 06:42 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norwegian lost in California
Posts: 890
|
The elusive firmware fix -- a revelation on my part
As some of you know, my tentative plans were to wait until NAB before I lashed out dough on my MKII. But now as NAB winds down, without any announcement from Canon to upgrade the MKII firmware, I think I know how Canon is playing this:
My thinking is -- as long as the camera sells like candy, why would they fix something that isn't really broken, especially when Nikon hasn't come up with anything that's even remotely as hot as the (crippled) MKII?! Hence, I doubt we'll see any firmware fix until sales slow down significantly, or until someone (Nikon) releases a MKII killer. This might take some time since Canon is just doing fine where they are right now. As far as I can tell, the MKII was a hit at the NAB -- and this was the first time a DSLR was presented as a professional video camera, (at least at this show). Oh well, we'll see how long I can wait. (Come'on Nikon, get your act together... will ya?!) -- peer
__________________
www.NoPEER.com |
April 25th, 2009, 12:23 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
Never in the field of digital cameras was so little needed by so many from so few.
After more than a decade of digital cameras, Canon has never once added a new feature in a firmware upgrade. Mighty Canon is like a rock, never wavering nor faltering. Even when lens sales are dropping due to lack of manual aperture control, it will not stray from its course. Some might consider the Canon 300D to be a mistake on the part of Canon. after all, valuable features such as ISO 3200 and MLU were included in the firmware for both the 300D and 20D, but only the 300D was crippled by disabling them, to boost sales of the 20D (even for people who didn't want the size or weight). Of course, photographers soon found a way to re-enable the features with modified firmware. But I don't think this counts as Canon providing a firmware upgrade, and they have been much more careful to cover their tracks when they cripple features. Lesser companies would have given in to so-called "customers" and their "feedback" six months ago. But not Canon. It will sooner go bankrupt than stoop to such a low level as to offer customers even one vital feature for free. In all the course of history, this may be the one perfect storm that would cause them to release such a firmware. But even these powerful circumstances are no match for the stalwart fortitude of such a megacorporation. If Canon adds manual control or 24p in a free firmware upgrade, I'll eat my hat. |
April 25th, 2009, 05:51 AM | #3 | ||
Wizard Status
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 239
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
April 25th, 2009, 08:29 AM | #4 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Quote:
You're still smoking Winston! Remember that long firmware wishlist for the XH-A1 that never happened? To be fair, it really grates me that Sony (on my EX1) will go to market with beta firmware, come up with a fix for it, call it an "upgrade," charge you for it in some parts of the world but not others, make you send your cam in to get it when you can do it yourself in 10 minutes. I vastly prefer Canon's policy. (But I agree with you, they will never update to 24p). |
|
April 25th, 2009, 10:34 AM | #5 | |||
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Technically, those are all "features", but to me they are in a different category then what I want for the 5D2. Me too. Sure it happened. They just charged $4,000 for it and called it "XH-A1s". ;) Just like I bet they will charge $2,700 for the 5D2 firmware upgrade and call it a "5D Mark IIn". |
|||
| ||||||
|
|