|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 3rd, 2009, 10:13 AM | #46 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
I will have the Z-Finder on Wednesday, I will probably write an article on it once I have used it a bit. The Z-Finder IS a Schneider loupe, so I can't see what the difference would be other than the Z-Finder is already setup and ready to use and if you buy a Scheider loupe, you will have to engineer the front piece, mounting system and buy the eye cup separately.
The quality of the image should be identical because we know that the loupe portion of the Z-Finder is the Schneider loupe. Dan |
May 4th, 2009, 04:57 AM | #47 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lancashire UK
Posts: 496
|
Quote:
Cheers Avey |
|
May 4th, 2009, 08:22 AM | #48 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 51
|
Thanks Ray Bell for that useful suggestion about the LCD Pop-Up Screen Hood Shade Cover.
How does the cover mount on the 5D MKII? If I get a HoodLoupe and mount it on the cover you describe will I be able to quickly attach it to the 5DM2 and remove it at will? |
May 4th, 2009, 08:53 AM | #49 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,414
|
it mounts on the 5DMKII eyepiece... on the camera body you sqeeze the eye piece and
pull it up... takes a little effort, just sqeeze and rock it back and forth as you pull it up. Then the Shade cover just slips onto the eyepiece slot... |
May 4th, 2009, 09:57 AM | #50 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 51
|
Thanks Ray. Sounds like a great solution.
|
May 4th, 2009, 10:16 AM | #51 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tartu, Estonia
Posts: 579
|
...and DIY finder attached to it would look something like that http://www.autonomicum.com/5DMKII/IMG_4937.JPG
T |
May 4th, 2009, 12:29 PM | #52 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
Toenis:
How in the heck did you get that wild finish on the loupe? Or is that your setup? Pretty cool and funky looking. Dan |
May 7th, 2009, 11:29 AM | #53 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 6
|
works for me
Just when i was about to get the Hoodloup 3 i stumbled on few bad reviews about it on this board.
having no other choice but to wait for the over priced Z finder,yesterday i walked into a store that carries the Hoodman,and after trying it i decided it works perfectly for me, no blurry side and out of focus to report. i did get the $20 rubber band for now (i will figure out a better mounting way later) but even with that it works perfectly. defiantly helps with critical focus outdoors and by pushing the camera against my eye i was able to hold a very steady shot @ 200MM for a long while. (heavy 70-200 2.8 ) just my 2 cents. my 5D montage: YouTube - 5d MK II montage Last edited by Guy Jackson; May 7th, 2009 at 09:09 PM. |
May 10th, 2009, 01:07 AM | #54 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,531
|
I have been concerned by descriptions of poor quality optics on the Hoodman as I had ordered two (one for me & one for my wife) direct from the manufacturer. I needn't have worried as the Hoodmen arrived this week & the optics are fine, very clear in fact. The dioptre adjustment is excellent. I am short-sighted & usually have to remove my glasses & get my eye really close to the LCD screen to see the detail (not eye-piece close just 6"/15cm) but then I cannot see what I am filming except through the LCD without putting my glasses back on & then I can't see the LCD clearly. I can adjust the Hoodloupe so that I can now see to focus clearly with my glasses on.
The rubber-band affair to secure the Hoodman is a bit awkward but I have on order a couple of the LCD hoods & I am hoping that I can rig up something combining the hood with the Hoodman as using the viewfinder attachment should be far more secure & stable than the rubber bands. I can't recall now who raised the question of poor optics on the Hoodman but wonder if the problem was with that particular example, maybe the Hoodman has changed designed or perhaps they didn't adjust it properly & it really was out of focus. Whatever the reason I can confirm that the optics are just fine. Maybe the Schneider/Z-Finder is better but it does come at a cost. The Hoodman is definitely not poor quality & is worthwhile for the price. |
May 11th, 2009, 12:31 PM | #55 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,414
|
|
| ||||||
|
|