|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 20th, 2009, 01:46 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 307
|
Clear Choice for HDMI Monitor for 5D2?
I just posted a question here:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/sdtv-hdtv...ml#post1030890 but I thought this forum might be a better place to start, since we're all using the same camera and have similar missions. I need to have a monitor by the 28th, since i have a project I'm shooting then with my 5D2, and will have a DP and other people needing to view a monitor. ALL suggestions will be most appreciated. |
March 20th, 2009, 02:30 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,414
|
|
March 20th, 2009, 02:57 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6
|
Marshall v-lcd70p-hdm
Marshall v-lcd70p-hdmi. A lot of cool features
Marshall V-LCD70P HD camera Monitor - dvcreators.network forums |
March 20th, 2009, 03:55 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
I haven't yet hooked up the 5D MkII HDMI output, but I understand that it devolves to 480 lines when recording. Given that, it seems that an HDMI monitor is overkill - unless used for reviewing footage. Also, isn't the output 4x3 during recording and Live View? An analog 4x3 monitor should do the trick for filming. For review, a regular HDTV would give a larger image that would show up flaws. Of course, you need AC power for the HDTV, but it doesn't need to be carted around with the camera as you shoot.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
March 20th, 2009, 05:22 PM | #5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Randwick Australia
Posts: 59
|
Clear Choice For HDMI Monitor For 5D2 ?
Quote:
What I have since discovered, a cheap 3in magnifying glass lens mounted in conduit tube with bracket, does a better job. Certainly more cost effective. I have used this approach with my EX1, it also works. |
|
March 20th, 2009, 06:36 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
There are times when the monitor will help, and times when the magnifier will work. I have a cheap 19 HD monitor, a 200 7" portable monitor with battery pack, and the magnifier set up. I made one some weeks back and a picture of the sholder rig. It actually works very well. by the time the 16:9 SD monitor is chopped off at sides, your image is not much bigger than the LCD, and it resolves lower. And as for the 16:9 19 incher, I do have the HDMI cable now, but you actually get a bigger image through the composite cable...
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
March 20th, 2009, 06:54 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 172
|
I bought a 19" Vizio 720p TV. Talk about cheap and has HDMI and composite inputs. Of course this only works when you have something to set it on and power.
|
March 20th, 2009, 09:07 PM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
|
|
March 20th, 2009, 09:21 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 172
|
How is this possible? I've not heard of monitoring through USB on a laptop. That could be a solution when there is no power available.
|
March 20th, 2009, 09:55 PM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
My only problem is in giving the director a replay of a scene. There is no way to play back the scene except to use the little LCD on the camera or move the CF card over, which is what I do now. Scenes are usually short and you can copy a scene at 4X rate. I'm working on a kludge to be able to start viewing the scene immediately after putting the card in. My theory is that when the director thinks he has a good shot from watching the laptop screen live, I swap CF cards and give him the old one. Then he can decide to shoot or review himself. The director can even put the shots he likes in folders organized the way he thinks. You could even drag them into an editor and watch rough cuts on the spot. |
|
March 20th, 2009, 10:07 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 172
|
Thanks Mark, I'm going to go try this out. I don't know why I was never aware of it before.
|
March 20th, 2009, 10:11 PM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
I have found the video to be good, but I've never seen the video on one of these real monitors discussed on this thread. Let me know how it compares. I assume there is a delay, but the director wouldn't care. |
|
March 23rd, 2009, 11:16 AM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Duluth, GA
Posts: 80
|
Wow great idea. Do you think hooking a netbook top of laptop like a 10 dell mini would do the trick? I could fashion some kind of stand my tripod to put this smalll laptop on there .
|
March 23rd, 2009, 12:41 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 307
|
I tried t his the other night, after reading about it here.
It works on a desktop, so I'd guess it will work on a laptop, since it's only USB. And since it IS only USB, the display is significantly reduced in frame rate. To my eye,I'd guess I was getting about 12FPS update with a bit of a lag (as noted above). As far as I know, USB just can't transfer that kind of data quickly enough for real-time. On the plus side (for me), I hooked the HDMI from the camera into my 50" Panny, and was not offended by the 480p display. I think a nice little (inexpensive) monitor will be a benefit on most shoots that I do. |
March 23rd, 2009, 01:56 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Duluth, GA
Posts: 80
|
Ugh too bad about the 12 fps.. If it was just a little more I think it would a perfect solution for a 5d II photog / videographer remote. Even at 12 fps i think it would be good enough for helping focus though. USB 2.0's bandwidth i would think should be enough for it.
|
| ||||||
|
|