|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 5th, 2009, 09:31 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,414
|
Thought you guys/gals might like this one
|
March 5th, 2009, 10:03 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,414
|
|
March 5th, 2009, 11:44 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canyon Country, CA
Posts: 445
|
|
March 6th, 2009, 12:30 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,961
|
I've been saying that a small camera with a big chip would change everything for years.
How did you mount the camera? Were the guys just holding it while skiing like that? |
March 6th, 2009, 12:45 AM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Great ski video. The wide lens was perfect for the task. What rolling shutter?
I would have liked to have seen the original, pre-Vimeo footage.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
March 6th, 2009, 12:58 AM | #6 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
Quote:
Meh, I shot the same thing at Big White last weekend... ...except Big White hadn't had snow in 3 weeks and sucked... so it just left me pissed off. :)
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
|
March 6th, 2009, 12:04 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 80
|
Love both of them!
Powder Mountain was awesome--the only problem now is that I want to buy that fish eye lens!! |
March 6th, 2009, 12:47 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 542
|
Are you downloading the originally uploaded video? It's obviously not the source shots, but it's WAY BETTER than watching it streamed off vimeo. Anything that you really want to watch on Vimeo should be downloaded this way IMHO. The difference can be seriously dramatic, if not just because the 30p to 24p stutter goes away (I think). Which by the way is why I hate Vimeo for 5D2 footage, that 24p thing just ruins every streamed video IMHO.
|
March 6th, 2009, 07:25 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California USA
Posts: 576
|
There's a link to a "de-fished" version too which makes it look even faster.
Julian |
March 7th, 2009, 02:00 PM | #10 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Thanks for the tip. That's MUCH better.
I'd bet a lot of people see the Vimeo streaming version and think that the 5D MkII codec is crummy. Frankly, it holds up great. The download and streaming versions are night and day apart.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst Last edited by Jon Fairhurst; March 7th, 2009 at 02:37 PM. |
March 8th, 2009, 05:58 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 542
|
For streaming, I personally don't understand why more people don't render out a downrezzed version of their footage (say 640x360 or so). It'll stream well and run smoothly at 30p. Also, and I've said this before, I think Blip.tv is way underrated. If you render a swf directly off your source at 640x360p30 at under 1mbs, you can upload that to Blip and they'll just stream the exact file you uploaded (no transcoding). I haven't found any other site that won't transcode, let alone a 1mbs file (I think there are a few that won't transcode really low bit rate files, maybe even youtube, but blip.tv rules IMHO).
|
March 9th, 2009, 12:15 AM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
Here’s one that I found yesterday.
Cannon 5D Mark II on Vimeo |
March 9th, 2009, 12:10 PM | #13 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Quote:
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
| ||||||
|
|