|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 5th, 2009, 05:54 PM | #16 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
Also, noise reduction is easy in post. |
|
March 5th, 2009, 06:14 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 94
|
WOW i have never seen ISO 51200, i have to go try this tonight... That is insanely high!
I guess i should have been more clear that you will not get super high usable ISO out of the camera. You will need to adjust in post. But as always the better out of the camera the better it looks in post! :) wow 51200... sorry i just wrap my head around that number :) thanks Michael |
March 5th, 2009, 06:37 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
|
|
March 5th, 2009, 09:33 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alpharetta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 760
|
Just from looking at the supplied picture....
1. The depth of field is high, which tells me you have the aperture stepped down. 2. The very limited amount of blur in the vehicles going across the frame tells me the shutter speed is quick, especially considering it is night time. Which leads me to conclude 3. You have the ISO/gain cranked way up. |
March 9th, 2009, 11:47 AM | #20 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 7
|
Night Footage
Just a thought, but have ypu set the meter lock function properly?
|
March 9th, 2009, 12:21 PM | #21 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
Quote:
This problem was solved using faster lenses. The one I tested with was the 24-105L F4... just not fast enough to give a clean picture in low light. The f1.4 was enough... but barely, and had to expose down a bit to get under 2500iso, which to me is the point it starts to get ugly.
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
|
| ||||||
|
|