|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 20th, 2009, 12:08 PM | #16 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Bad ergonomics? It's no different than any other D-SLR. Add
the optional battery grip if you want 1D / 1Ds type ergonomics. |
February 20th, 2009, 12:31 PM | #17 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
Ha! Very apt analogy. I am definitely haunted at the moment.
__________________
http://www.michaelfriedman.org/ |
|
February 20th, 2009, 01:05 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
Quote:
But as soon as you start shooting video, ergonomics go out the window. But let's not talk about video: it is a stills camera, after all. So lets talk about just stills. As soon as you start shooting handheld stills with liveview, ergonomics go out the window. This would be completely rectified with a swing out tilting LCD. Currently, if you shoot hand held and want to achieve critical focus at f/2.8 or wider, you have to buy an Eg-S screen and focus manually, because the standard focusing screen cannot show any depth of field wider than f/3.5. Furthermore, the stated autofocus error tolerances are wider than that what's needed for critical f/2.8. By the time you get down to f/2, f/1.4, and f/1.2, it's pretty much required that you spray-and-pray because there are no optical viewfinder screens to get you close enough with certainty (no real ground glass, no split prism, no microprism collar). Not to mention that some lenses shift focus when stopping down, requiring you to focus with the DOF preview button, which is too dim with the high resolution focus screens. Liveview is the perfect solution to all these problems: it allows fully critical focus and WYSIWYG. But it's very un-ergonomic to use handheld because you have to hold it up in front of your face like a digicam user. That's hard to do with the 600mm f/4 L IS. ;) A swing-out tilting LCD would allow handheld stills shooting with all the benefits. Of course, the biggest benefit would be for video shooters. |
|
February 20th, 2009, 01:31 PM | #19 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
How many D-SLR's have a flip-out LCD though? (admittedly a rhetorical question; because the answer is none that I can immediately think of). In other words, while the criticism may be valid, it applies to *all* D-SLR's, and not just the 5D Mk. II in particular (since it's no different ergonomically than any other D-SLR). My point is that it's hard to label the lack of a flip-out LCD as a "con" since D-SLR's in general don't have flip-out LCD panels to begin with. Live-view enabled or not, there's currently no such thing as a Canon or Nikon D-SLR with a flip-out LCD.
|
February 20th, 2009, 01:46 PM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 523
|
Are we talking about a still camera or a video camera?
I'm hoping to buy a video camera in the next couple of months and, though I'm still reading about this camera, I've pretty much discounted it from consideration largely because of its ergonomics as a video camera. So, to me, talking about it being a great still camera really doesn't enter into a discussion about using it for video. My Canon S3 IS takes great looking SD video but its ergonomics suck! (Plus, it ain't even got a jack for an external mic.) For that matter, the picture of my HV20 looks great to me but I can't get used to the tiny size of it. After saying all that, I'm curious to see pictures of how people are using it as a video camera. I imagine it being some kind of Rube Goldberg contraption with wires and doohickeys sticking onto the tripod--made moreso due to the form factor of its SLR heritage. If Canon put the same camera in a traditonal camcorder form factor*, I'd probably jump at it. Fingers crossed for something like it at NAB. *that'd be a wierd looking device
__________________
Andy Tejral Railroad Videographer |
February 20th, 2009, 01:53 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
Agreed. As a still camera, fixed LCD is par for the course. Of course, live HDMI output would satisfy that need somewhat, too, via third party LCD and EVF.
|
February 20th, 2009, 02:02 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
A flip out LCD screen would be a great feature - even for a still cam.
Imagine needing to shoot over a crowd as a famous person walks by. If you could tilt the LCD down, you would be able to frame and time your shots.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
February 20th, 2009, 07:20 PM | #23 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
Posts: 27
|
|
February 21st, 2009, 03:40 AM | #24 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
And, what would be even better is 10x zoom picture in picture, so I could frame and focus without needing to switch. |
|
February 21st, 2009, 05:51 AM | #25 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
I'd like to have this thread go back on topic (what are your top five reasons to go with 5D MK. II). Because what we're talking about now isn't even about what the 5D Mk.II actually is (it's a specific type of still photo camera -- an SLR -- that happens to have an HD video recording mode). As for wish-lists of what you want to see it morphed into, that's a subject for a different thread. |
|
February 21st, 2009, 09:04 AM | #26 |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 15
|
Since I just joined the 5D2 club, I'll chime in
5. I finally get to own a camera better than my wife's (40D).
4. An excuse to buy the 35/1.4L 3. And the 135/2L 2. I can ebay my FX1 and stop scaring the children. And finally, the #1 reason to buy the 5DMkII 1. ISO 25600! I'm sure I'll never use it, but its fun to say! Marc |
February 21st, 2009, 10:01 AM | #27 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cebu Philippines
Posts: 69
|
Just an ice breaker.
I've misunderstood number 5 as I finally get to own a camera better than my wife And so I jump into conclusion... of what the heck...I'd be better buy this camera right now.. and learned later you are referring to your wife's 40D. |
February 22nd, 2009, 09:19 PM | #28 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
Quote:
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
|
February 23rd, 2009, 07:00 AM | #29 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 200
|
more or less the same reasons as others.
5) To stop using my 35mm adapters (once a necessary evil) 4) Low light 3) Inconspicuous filming. 2) Skill building. I learned so much when I bought my first video camera (Sony HC1). Owning my own camera allow to me to get into video more than I ever could with borrowing cameras at work occasionally. Again when I got a 35mm adapter, I learn about how shooting films differs than video. With the 5D2 I'm already learning so much more about still photography which is ironically what I started with prior to going digital and led me to video. 1) I'm bad with money. |
February 24th, 2009, 12:44 PM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
|
| ||||||
|
|