|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 27th, 2009, 10:19 PM | #61 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Wow, Bruce. I bought 5 of these early this year, and all reside nicely on my various Nikon lenses... sorry you are having that issue.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
July 27th, 2009, 10:29 PM | #62 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
July 28th, 2009, 11:52 AM | #63 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
Just to second that, I've got interviews shot with a nikon 80mm f/2 where it was simply impossible to keep the subject in sharp focus. Focus on the nose and the ears are out of focus and vice versa. I try to focus on the eyes but if they move their head even a few inches it's off - and once you're recording you can't see that on the LCD so there's no way to be sure until playback. I'm shooting interviews at f/5.6 now as even f/4 runs the risk of going out of focus with movement. This is all for MCU work, camera 6-10 feet from the subject - smaller apertures only get manageable once you start increasing that distance significantly or if you have a very still subject. f/1.4, etc, is nice to have as an option, and if you make it work can be absolutely beautiful - but if you are just trying to get nice shallow DOF when shooting people it's certainly not necessary. In fact one of the real reasons to get more expensive fast glass like that is that once it's stepped down into the f/2-4 range it'll generally outperform lenses with maximum apertures in that range.
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
July 28th, 2009, 09:51 PM | #64 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Angelo Texas
Posts: 1,518
|
Quote:
Both shallow DOF tests and night low light tests look great. I'll be looking for a 24mm f2.8 next (to get away from the portrait/tele perspective sometimes) when my finances recover from a CAVISION viewfinder setup, tripod and 501 head, and Spiderbrace purchases. The 50mm performs for me fairly close to what your Series E 100mm does. The 5D MkII is producing some of the most "life like" video of anything I've seen. That is one fantastic camera in video mode! |
|
July 28th, 2009, 11:07 PM | #65 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
In fact with all the emphasis on Canon and Nikon lenses, there are a lot of Pentax K mount lense out there that are perfectly good lens. I had to shave off a flange or two, but lenses will work with adapters available on ebay, too.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
July 29th, 2009, 10:59 AM | #66 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Quote:
That said, don't sweat getting the best resolution for video. The camera's pixels are nice and large, which takes the load off the lens.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
November 19th, 2009, 07:53 PM | #67 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 323
|
Anyone bough one of this from China?? Nikon to Canon EOS Adapter with Focus AF Confirmation - eBay (item 320266984053 end time Dec-16-09 01:06:16 PST)
Just wondering how it fits and the quality or any problem at all with this adapter. The one from fotodiox are expensive $149. I'm looking for some of the adapter that everyone here getting the Kawa i think but all the ebay link are out of date. I have been reading that Kawa is the one that everybody are very happy with right. I wish i can afford L glass but dam expensive. well maybe i'll get the 70-200 f2.8 IS that is other prime i might have to get nikon because of the manual apreture. Awsome. advice please. Thank you |
| ||||||
|
|