|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 1st, 2009, 04:51 PM
|
#46 | |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Quote:
Nikons are inexpensive and are very nice mechanically, but... * The camera is able to correct for lens falloff before the codec with EF lenses. * We can now use image stabilization, since we don't have to unscrew/tape the lens. * Some EF lenses are especially nice, like the 24mm f/1.4 L, where there is no direct Nikon competition. * For those who also want to take stills, having modern functions is really nice. Personally, I think manual lenses are fine at the wide end and for macros. I like the features with the longer stuff. With 85mm and above, I tend to photograph things that move. Being able to turn the camera on, put it in full auto and hit the shutter release can make the difference between getting the moment and not. The nice thing with manual controls is we now have the choice to buy Canon lenses or adapted lenses. I'm going with Canon for the stills compatibility.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
|
|
|
June 1st, 2009, 07:55 PM
|
#47 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Beijing
Posts: 665
|
Jon,
Your points are correct but as an owner of several L lenses like the 35 f1.4 and 24mm f1.4, having been using the new manual firmware for a while, I can still say the use of manual glass is my preference. I still think the ability to focus smoothly and 'ride' the aperture wins for me. To each their own I guess. That said the new firmware make the Canon glass really usabable and there are situations where I'm sure I will use Canon lenses now. The 'best' Canon lenses for video IMHO are going to be the TS-E range which still have nicely damped manual focus rings, or the Zeiss ZE range. I agree totally that for stills a Canon lens is best, but I prefer Nikon camera bodies for photo work. Dan |
|
|
|
|
June 1st, 2009, 08:23 PM
|
#48 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
Link: |
|
|
|
|
|
June 1st, 2009, 08:32 PM
|
#49 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 218
|
Perfect, thanks. I just ordered 4.
__________________
Canon 5D Mark II || L-Series Lenses || Steadicam Pilot || Final Cut Studio www.lovestorymedia.com |
|
|
|
|
June 1st, 2009, 09:02 PM
|
#50 | |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Quote:
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
|
|
|
|
June 1st, 2009, 09:37 PM
|
#51 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Beijing
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
Dan |
|
|
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2009, 12:00 AM
|
#52 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2009, 12:35 AM
|
#53 | |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Quote:
Actually, with my 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS, I can get a surprisingly tight DOF at 5.6, just because of the long focal length. I'm selling it, not because of the DOF limitations, but because I want better low light performance for video. Most of these photos (aside from the logs and the fleeing bunnies) were shot with that lens. Spring 2009 (If anybody wants to buy the lens, please contact me.)
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
|
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2009, 02:36 AM
|
#54 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 513
|
Quote:
Right now I can see Contax Carl Zeiss T* 85mm f1.4 & 180mm/2.8 T* in the US$400-$500 range which seems pretty attractive. I ask you because I've been checking out your stellar photojournalism all over the web - you're one of the best. Many thanks, Josh |
|
|
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2009, 02:51 AM
|
#55 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Beijing
Posts: 665
|
Josh,
Thanks, personally I use the Contax Zeiss lenses and I do recommend them as they are easy to adapt and focus the 'right' way round for a video camera. They are sharp and have a lovely look that I just love. There are some focal lengths that are still not available in ZF or ZE mount. Although some need slight modifications like filing down the the pins on the rear of the lens, its not hard to do. My current lineup of Contax lenses is 25mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 35mm f1.4, 50mm f1.4, 85mm f1.4, 135mm f2.8, 180mm f2.8, 300mm f4 and 2x mutar convertor. The whole lot ran to around $3000US, not bad compared to Canon or Zeiss ZF equivalents. Do I prefer them to Nikkors? well sometimes, I find Nikkor zooms easier to use when running around. My current favorites are the 17-35mm f2.8, 20-35mm f2.8 and 80-200mm f2.8, all older designs which have aperture rings and don't alter length when you focus. I also have a Canon 24-70mm f2.8 which is useful for running around, replacing the Tokina 28-70 f2.8 I was using before the manual exposure upgrade. Hope that helps a little Dan |
|
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2009, 03:01 AM
|
#56 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 513
|
Thanks so much Dan, that gives me a lot of confidence to check out some Contax Zeiss glass!
|
|
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2009, 03:12 AM
|
#57 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Beijing
Posts: 665
|
Josh,
I think the real 'bargains' are the Zeiss 28mm f2.8, the 50mm f1.4, the 85mm f1.4 and the 135mm f2.8. All can be found for great prices if you shop around. Dan |
|
|
|
|
July 27th, 2009, 03:12 PM
|
#58 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 92
|
Dan,
Could you elaborate why you prefer the Contax Zeiss primes to the Nikkors? I'll be doing video work that will always go through a heavy color correction pass, so I'm wondering if the particular saturation/contrast characteristics of the Zeiss lenses might be evened out once you factor in color correction, of if there are "other" special qualities that make you prefer the Zeiss primes. I've been very impressed with all your work on guardian and Vimeo so any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks so much, Ryan |
|
|
|
|
July 27th, 2009, 05:16 PM
|
#59 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 27th, 2009, 09:52 PM
|
#60 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Angelo Texas
Posts: 1,518
|
Kawa Nikon lens to EOS adapter rings...Watch 'em!
I had to settle for the T1i and no telling if Canon will ever do a firmware upgrade for that model. So I had to go the manual Nikkor lens route.
I ordered one of the Kawa adapters and the groove for the AI "lugs" was not machined deep enough. The "lug" would jam against the bottom of the groove and not allow the lens to turn all the way into the adapter. The seller did replace it, but the replacement wouldn't fit either so I sent that one back and the ebay merchant preferred to refund and cancel the transaction. One of the members of this site had an extra that he sent me and it fits perfect. They are now apparently "churning" these things out in China with little regard for specifications so it looks like for additional adapters I'll be going with the Bower brand at $39.95. Looks a little more "robust" in photos. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
