|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 13th, 2008, 02:50 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 307
|
Nikon to EOS Adapter
Seems like at just about every turn, I'm making incorrect assumptions about my 5DM2.
FORTUNATELY, I got y'all to keep me straight. Thanks very much for that. To that end, I'm about to purchase an adapter so my Nikon lenses will work on my Canon body. I've found several that say they'll do the job, ranging from $6.00 to $250.00. This is the one I'm taking most seriously at this time. It SEEMS good for the money. Adapter Fits Canon EOS Body To Nikon lens F AI AIS AF - eBay (item 360114342352 end time Jan-05-09 22:24:44 PST) Would I do well with this? Here are some others I have tracked down (not counting the bazillion I've found on Ebay): http://www.fotodiox.com/shop/product...117ed96451dec4 Amazon.com: Adorama Nikon Lens To Canon EOS Body Adapter: Electronics Novoflex | Lens Adapter Nikon to Canon EOS Body | EOS/NIK | B&H |
December 13th, 2008, 04:42 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
I think most of these are pretty much the same, even the cheapest ones work OK. All they are is an EOS lens mount screwed to a Nikon body mount, it's not ocket science! I think if some are a bit more pricey they may just be a little batter made.
Steve |
December 13th, 2008, 05:00 PM | #3 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
The first shop's response was almost wistful - "yeah, I really wish we had something like that" as if it was a great idea and everyone's been asking for it for years but no one's figured out a way to do it. The next couple of shops were basically laughing at the request, as if it was some crazy idea and of course they wouldn't have an adapter like that. Finally, after exhausting all the local pro shops I call the largest local Ritz and the guy literally goes off on a rant about how Nikon has a proprietary mount and won't let anyone do anything with it, and that even if they would it's a physical impossibility and would probably destroy your camera body, and that in any case it would void your warranty and leave you with no recourse if something went wrong with the camera later. So at this point I'm the one laughing, I tell him that this is basically what a lot of people are doing in order to shoot video with the 5D, and that I was hoping to find the adapter locally but they're readily available from multiple sources online. His response was "well, if you *believe* in that" - his emphasis, not sure if he meant the adapter or the internet itself - "you can give it a try but you'll just end up destroying your camera!". So, yeah, guess I'll be ordering it online...
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" Last edited by Evan Donn; December 14th, 2008 at 10:11 AM. |
|
December 13th, 2008, 08:38 PM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 307
|
Quote:
I think I'll go order one now. Thanks for the re-enforcement. |
|
December 13th, 2008, 09:15 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Portland's Pro Photo Supply didn't carry it (probably due to liability), but was aware of them, respectful, and said "you'd need to get that on the Internet."
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
December 13th, 2008, 10:57 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,961
|
Would lenses that can damage the mirror cause shops to be weary of selling the adapters? I'm sure they also want to sell all new lenses for their cameras and wouldn't suggest keeping older lenses for a different brand body.
|
December 14th, 2008, 05:14 AM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
Thing is Marcus that's unlikely as an y adapter actually moves the lens further from the mirror not closer to it! I'm not surprised at all at the response from camera stores, the folks there often are pretty unaware of the way things work they just have their product and price lists and that's it!
Steve |
December 14th, 2008, 06:14 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 317
|
Has anyone got a link where I can get one from the UK, ebay (UK version) does not list any in the UK just from China etc. And other links via Google from the UK look suspect.
Thanks, James |
December 14th, 2008, 06:34 AM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
|
|
December 14th, 2008, 11:44 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MOSCOW
Posts: 860
|
Does anyone know if for example Nikkor 70 200 2.8 VR lens will work on Canon via adapter?
How would you control the aperture, (there is no outside aperture ring ) ? |
December 14th, 2008, 12:27 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 706
|
G series will not work at this time. There isn't an adapter that will allow aperture control. The only adapter for the G series is designed only for the Nikon 14-24.
Last edited by Don Miller; December 14th, 2008 at 12:30 PM. Reason: clarification |
December 14th, 2008, 12:41 PM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 706
|
Quote:
So Canon flange + 2.5 mil adapter = Nikon Flange Also the Canon EF mount has a wide diameter. The Nikon F mount is relatively narrow. To summarize, a camera that can use other mounts has the characteristics of short flange distance and a wide opening. That's Canon. |
|
December 14th, 2008, 01:10 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
Just to be pedantic, the 70-210 VR will mount, you just won't be able to change the aperture (you could insert something in the mechanism that held the aperture at a certain stop, but it'd be silly really).
In terms of flange distance, there is another option if the ffd doesn't allow a straight adapter, you just introduce an optic that gives a small multiplier effect (like a 1.4x teleconverter) and you can make it work. Doesn't solve the aperture problem though. The VR won't work either as it needs power, you'd be better off getting an older 80-200 f2.8 or Sigma 70-210 f2.8 (very nice lens). Steve |
December 14th, 2008, 01:20 PM | #14 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Nikon G - Canon EOS Adapter |
|
December 14th, 2008, 01:41 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MOSCOW
Posts: 860
|
Bernard,
sorry I got confused, "I thought it was already mentioned in this forum that you could use this adapter which allows aperture control on a Nikon lens with no apeture ring ? Nikon G - Canon EOS Adapter" so it's possible to use 70 200 2.8 Nikkor and control aperture? Nikon G - Canon EOS Adapter, THE ONLY ADAPTER THAT ALLOWS THAT? |
| ||||||
|
|