|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 14th, 2008, 02:11 PM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
New one on me Bernard, seems reasonable enough though.
Steve |
December 14th, 2008, 02:45 PM | #17 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/canon-eos...rol-video.html I don't own a Nikon G lens and I have not tried it myself. Note that the web site mentions that you change the aperture by rotating the lens itself (relative to the adapter). If you use a polarizer, the polariser will rotate and affect the image. And if you're using a lens hood with a 'petal' shape where the corner portions of the hood are cut off and the top/side/bottom have extended 'petals', when you rotate it then the 'petal' portion of the lens could appear in the corner of the image. The web site also mentions that they are developing a version where you use a lever instead of rotating the lens. Not sure if/when this will be available. |
|
December 14th, 2008, 02:57 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 706
|
Bernard, I have the 16-9 adapter.
It is specific to the 14-24. It is not designed to work with other G lenses. You can keep posting links but that does not make your opinion valid. |
December 14th, 2008, 07:43 PM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 71
|
I saw such adaptors in 2nd hand camera shops inside the Computer 298 Shopping Hall in Wanchai of Hong Kong. Different types : Minolta to EOS, Pentax to EOS, M-mount to EOS ... Certainly there will be Nikon to EOS. They seems to be simple metal rings in about HK$200. I did not ask the shop assistant but I think they work. Many camera hobbists in Hong Kong like to change lens between brands for fun, perhaps. You may try to buy them through e-shopping.
|
December 15th, 2008, 06:33 AM | #20 | ||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Nowhere in my post did I offer my opinion on the product. I only pointed out the 16-9 web site that states that: Quote:
And because the lens rotates on the adapter, it goes without saying that the polarizer and hood will rotate together with the lens -- that is not an opinion. |
||
December 15th, 2008, 03:25 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 293
|
Matthew et al:
Having gone through 3 different nikon-EOS adapter rings recently (of varying prices and claims) I have to say the fotodiox pro version is by far the best, more secure. The converters I purchased via eBay do work, but they are sloppy and have a lot of play in them. Hope that helps Brian
__________________
========================== Brian Valente Redrock Microsystems |
December 15th, 2008, 06:47 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Has anybody compared the Fotodiox pro and consumer versions?
Pro: Fotodiox.com Consumer: Fotodiox.com I've only compared the prices. ;)
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
December 15th, 2008, 07:16 PM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 293
|
yes, I did check out the consumer vs. pro version and again it comes down to tolerances. The pro version is tight, no play in the mount. The consumer version has some play in it.
Brian
__________________
========================== Brian Valente Redrock Microsystems |
December 15th, 2008, 11:50 PM | #24 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,961
|
Thanks, Brian, you probably saved a lot of people a bunch of time and money. $90 is nothing compared to the hassle of a lousy lens attachment on what could be a $4000 lens and camera package.
|
December 16th, 2008, 11:13 AM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 307
|
Great, specific info, Brian. Thanks very much.
|
December 16th, 2008, 11:13 AM | #26 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 293
|
lol - well, I ended up spending about 400 on various adapters before I settled on fotodiox so hopefully that extra money will go to things like paying actors or craft services :)
Brian
__________________
========================== Brian Valente Redrock Microsystems |
December 16th, 2008, 12:25 PM | #27 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
I just ordered one for $79.95 on eBay. Thanks for the Fotodiox Pro tip!
Now, to figure out where to spend what's left of my lens budget. So far, I have a crummy old Sigma 28-70, a Canon 70-300 IS (arrives Wednesday, "Like New" from KEH for $415.), and my son has a 50mm 1.8 Nikon. Decisions, decisions...
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
December 16th, 2008, 05:09 PM | #28 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
Another thanks for the info Brian - I'd been wondering about the differences in all these adapters and just ordered the Fotodiox pro based on your experience. Maybe you can wrangle a commission out of them when they see the flood of orders...
As for lenses I think I'll start with the 85mm 2.0 as a cheap starting point until I've firmly decided on keeping the camera.
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
December 16th, 2008, 05:11 PM | #29 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 293
|
happy to pass along my experiences - I don't have any relationship with fotodiox just so folks know, I have nothing personal to gain.
B
__________________
========================== Brian Valente Redrock Microsystems |
| ||||||
|
|