|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 17th, 2008, 12:15 PM | #46 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 706
|
A constant speed fan under 60hz light is not a good test.
|
December 17th, 2008, 12:17 PM | #47 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
My son and I did a test last night and confirmed accurate, fast shutter speeds. We're still collecting data...
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
December 17th, 2008, 12:22 PM | #48 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 706
|
I've just realized this too. I've been testing using stills + video. This does not give the same results as Movie only. The exposure algorithms for video seems to be something of a mess.
|
December 17th, 2008, 12:56 PM | #49 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
In this mode I've had one situation where I deliberately underexposed in bright sunlight via small aperture, and once I hit record it switched to wide open (f4 on the kit lens, you can feel the lens click when it does this) and shutter speed jumped to 1/500 in order to preserve the underexposed look. * to do this you have to be in aperture or shutter priority modes
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
|
December 17th, 2008, 01:28 PM | #50 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 82
|
The tests (video and stills) were done using DC (battery) power.
Except for the 3rd (non-EF lens) test where I needed another, more powerful, light to test the higher shutter speed with the low ISO (100) automatically selected by the camera. |
| ||||||
|
|