|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 28th, 2011, 01:32 AM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: KLD, South Africa
Posts: 983
|
If you can only afford one lens the Canon 17-55mm F/2.8 IS is a brilliant all rounder lens.
|
January 28th, 2011, 01:27 PM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 689
|
Hi Kren,
Quote:
__________________
WeddingFilms.com>> |
|
January 28th, 2011, 01:37 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Williamstown Mass
Posts: 192
|
|
February 3rd, 2011, 11:40 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
Posts: 415
|
Just an update that we bought the following lenses.
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 XR VC and a couple of Vintage Lenses Super Takumar 105mm f/2.8 (bought at the pawnshop for $25) Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm F/2.8-4 (found in a thrift store for $20) Just waiting on my M42 EOS adapter which i ordered for $7.99 Again thanks everyone for all the helpful feedback..!! Kren Vertical Video Works* Winnipeg Videography |
February 4th, 2011, 01:17 AM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chania Crete Greece
Posts: 171
|
Excelent choices for the money.
However the Canon 50mm is fine for photography but the manual focus ring is small, and it's not so easy to work with for video. You will probably need a vintage alternative with a smoother focusing ring for video. |
| ||||||
|
|