|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 27th, 2010, 11:00 PM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 58
|
The 7D only outputs 480p while recording as well. This has been confirmed by numerous people including Philip Bloom.
|
September 27th, 2010, 11:02 PM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, Texas U.S.A
Posts: 1,117
|
Nope.
Because I have confirmed it. It retains resolution even while recording. Nothing changes in my HDTV and onboard HDMI monitor except a RED dot coming on and the center square disappearing and this While shooting a resolution chart. Have YOU confirmed this yourself? and also- Because i have also read Philips later blogs on this issue and he said it retains resolution. -but its merely academic since I do my own tech tests. |
September 27th, 2010, 11:15 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 58
|
I don't own a 7D but, judging from Google search results, there is a lot of argument as to what's being output via HDMI while recording.
|
September 27th, 2010, 11:23 PM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, Texas U.S.A
Posts: 1,117
|
Yeah, thats true about the internet, you need to filter and do a lot of confirmation and reconfirmation.
Philip's blog also burned me on getting the zeiss softar filter which is kinda pricey, as a solution against moire, I have been using the caprock filter and it can be effective, so I tried what he said and it absolutely doesnt work, you can see my post rebutting the softar's effectiveness on that particular topic on his blog. I'm not saying that most of his information is wrong, I have also picked up a lot there, but in this one it it was not right. I have learned to filter information from those whom you think gives their conclusions after doing their own analytical and systematic tests since that is also how i confirm information. Guy for instance went through the process of reconfirmation and found his initial observations incorrect, we can also learn a lot in these forums. |
September 28th, 2010, 01:03 AM | #20 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oak Park, Michigan
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
If canon released a firmware for manual audio on the 7d i'm almost positive i would buy one instead. |
|
September 28th, 2010, 01:22 AM | #21 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, Texas U.S.A
Posts: 1,117
|
For serious work, even if you can control audio in the camera, you'd still rather do it with separate recorder.
I use the Zoom h4n. I only use the audio of the camera as a guide track. For Not too serious work, then it doesnt matter if it is auto or not. |
September 28th, 2010, 01:41 AM | #22 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, Texas U.S.A
Posts: 1,117
|
Let me add, that on one big project, I didn't bring my audio recorder since the spec didn't call for on site audio.
BUT there was this native music performers that I needed to record so I just held the camera near them , recorded their performance and found the music quite acceptable. See here at 2:10, you can hear that the on board 7D audio is certainly acceptable. NO external mics! - I assume it will have same to slightly better results on the 60D. link; Costabella By Ted Ramasola On ExposureRoom |
September 28th, 2010, 01:53 AM | #23 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oak Park, Michigan
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
is there any chance of the 60d being able to have a firmware hack to allow 1080p output while recording. or perhaps a 7d crack or firmware update that will give it manual audio. i need one of these solutions! |
|
September 28th, 2010, 02:04 AM | #24 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, Texas U.S.A
Posts: 1,117
|
The cable you use from the zoom to camera need to be attenuated. I had my 2 cables custom made by my techie cousin. I guess you can have it long.
Tremel wasnt able to finish the 7D hack though. I doubt the 60 can be updated for full HD out while recording since it only has ONE digic processor. I also think that as a stills camera, the single digit models of canon has a higher resale value than the double digits. So if you would get a DSLR and in the near future decide to sell it cuz a new camera comes along (this is a certainty) the 7D would fetch better than the cheaper 60D. I say this cuz I truly think, that just like the 35 adapters, DSLRs is a phase we are passing through much quicker than the era of adapters. I can say that with certainty since I have made and used successfully 3 lens adapters, one for mid format lens and now use a DSLR. |
September 28th, 2010, 02:14 AM | #25 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oak Park, Michigan
Posts: 43
|
wasn't there a firmware hack for the 5d that gave it full 1080 output. i'm pretty sure thats only one digic chip as well. though you are probably right, the chances are far more likely the 7d gets manual audio. but seriously having a articulating screen and 1080 out with sdhc would be a dream! i just wish that they had given the 7d an articulating screen which iknow goes against all things photo, but the fact that you can use it in the exact same way as well as cover the screen actually can make it better for protection... what am i rambling about, it doesn't matter anyways. now to decide if it makes sense to wait for the release of the next gen cameras or buy something now. i don't really have a project to shoot right now, but i have been stockpiling old manual lenses and i am just inkling to give them a proper test and just film a bunch of footage. i'm really hoping the next gen of dslr's will have less aliasing.
|
| ||||||
|
|