|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 5th, 2010, 02:44 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brasil
Posts: 304
|
Thank you Perrone and Jon
"the dynamic range of a camera depends on the whole system, including sensor technology, size, and the rest of the signal chain". That`s it. Ron |
August 6th, 2010, 01:52 AM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 444
|
My 550D gives great colour, i use neutral with the colour set down a notch.
|
August 10th, 2010, 11:12 AM | #18 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
Quote:
Image comparison The reason why is pretty straightforward: when images from a small sensor and large sensor are displayed at the same size, the large sensor is concentrating more light into the same area. Whether that light is from one larger pixel or multiple pixels of the same size doesn't affect the outcome: the larger sensor has more dynamic range. Quote:
|
||
August 11th, 2010, 01:34 AM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 444
|
But it lacks the sharpness resolution of my HV30 which is a big dissapointment, its nothing to do with the edit i edit the raw 1920P files and BDs etc have the same resolution as direct camera playback.
|
August 11th, 2010, 08:45 AM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brasil
Posts: 304
|
Yes Martyn, my HV20 had noticiable more detail resolution than the t2i, as well as more latitude (dynamic range), even using your set up (neutral with the colour set down a notch).
That`s for me is the biggest disapointment. But it is a good and cheap way to get shallow depth of field, very useful in many situations. |
| ||||||
|
|