|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 21st, 2010, 02:28 PM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
I don't reckon your exposure compensation idea will work that well, simply because you don't have enough small steps available to make it smooth. Think about it, if you had 10 second shot on screen and you wanted to compensate 2 stops. You have 300 frames but only 6 x 1/3 steps to use, so every 50 frames it's just gonna jump. If you could adjust by 1/300th of a stop then it would work!
Jon, the problem with your statement was that you missed out the bit about it being the way that works for you. However you read it, it was absolute, there is only one way. No harm done anyway, and again nice shot! Evan, I would re-emphasize, take power into consideration, long shutter speeds use lots of juice, and you don't want the camera to go dead half way through. Good luck. Steve |
July 22nd, 2010, 04:03 AM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 969
|
Quote:
Last edited by Liam Hall; July 22nd, 2010 at 11:56 AM. |
|
| ||||||
|
|