|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 2nd, 2010, 08:07 PM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas/Phoenix
Posts: 39
|
once you get the money you'll probably want the sigma. I've got both. When i'm taking stills I use the 50 more often but for video or indoors I go for the 30 more. Sigma comes with a hood, too..
|
June 2nd, 2010, 08:30 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beverly, MA.
Posts: 49
|
Thanks, Ethan. I assume one advantage to the 50mm is it would have a bit less distortion on close-ups, and portraits than the 30mm does since you don't have to get as close to the subject to get a tight shot. You just need more room to work with.
|
June 3rd, 2010, 01:26 AM | #18 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pembroke Pines, Fl.
Posts: 1,842
|
Chris and terry,
Thanks. I'll order several. Bruce Yarock |
June 7th, 2010, 01:11 AM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 71
|
Canon 50mm 1.8
You may consider this cheap lens if you still have problems between Sigma 30mm and Canon 50mm 1.4. The performance of this Canon 50mm 1.8 is just wonderful regarding its price.
|
June 9th, 2010, 12:10 PM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beverly, MA.
Posts: 49
|
Thanks for the tip, Kenneth Tong.
|
June 9th, 2010, 12:26 PM | #21 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Last edited by Dylan Morgan; June 9th, 2010 at 05:39 PM. |
|
| ||||||
|
|