|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 16th, 2010, 08:39 AM | #31 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 217
|
Does anybody know what the difference between a 561B and 561BHDV is? Seems like the 561BHDV is the newer version but specwise there doesnt seem to be much difference
(found a new 561B for around half the price) |
August 17th, 2010, 11:15 AM | #32 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 90
|
I have both and they are the same monopod. The side knob to control tilt-friction looks different but functions the same as well. The head, feet and post feel the same to me and I use them every weekend.
|
August 17th, 2010, 11:48 AM | #33 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 217
|
perfect thanks!
|
August 18th, 2010, 11:07 AM | #34 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 643
|
The heads are different. The 561bhdv looks like a 701hdv minus the fluid panning while the 561b looks like small 501 with a 577 adapter on the top. Like Raymond mentioned, their locking mechanisms are different. The 561bhdv has a one like a 501/503 type while the 561b has one like the 577 adapter.
Everything from the below the headis the same. |
August 24th, 2010, 08:37 AM | #35 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 41
|
Pardon my ignorance, but could someone tell me what the benefit of the feet are? Is it just to be able to pan?
|
August 24th, 2010, 08:40 AM | #36 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pembroke Pines, Fl.
Posts: 1,842
|
The feet help stabilize it and makes it almost as sturdy as a tripod, but much easier to move. Add a fluyid head like a 501 and you've also got tilt and smoother panning.
Bruce Yarock |
August 24th, 2010, 09:38 AM | #37 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 90
|
Yep. Without the feet, the monopod will slip like crazy at the worst possible moments. The difference is night and day.
|
August 24th, 2010, 11:25 AM | #38 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 41
|
Thanks guys!
|
August 31st, 2010, 09:52 AM | #39 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 46
|
Worth it without the 501?
If I can only afford the 561BHDV and not the 501 (or some other head), is it still worth it for shooting a wedding? We'll have two low-to-medium grade Manfrotto tripods and a Merlin for some eye-candy, but for my walkaround workhorse, will the 561BHDV (with a 7D mounted) suffice?
I've also considered renting a should-mount, but this thread and some other articles have convinced me this monopod is the way to go. |
August 31st, 2010, 09:55 AM | #40 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 46
|
Z-Finder necessary?
Also, 1 more question. It'll be an outdoor wedding in mid-afternoon (albeit early fall). I've been looking for an excuse to rent a Z-Finder. Would the 561BHDV + Z-Finder be a totally useless/awkward combo?
|
August 31st, 2010, 12:03 PM | #41 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
The z-finder is an invaluable tool and takes out alot of guessing when it comes to exposing and color in strong daylight. It's worth every penny. The z-finder will also help with stabilizing your shots by adding an extra point of contact. We've eliminated one tripod due to this fact. Hope this helps David. |
|
August 31st, 2010, 12:06 PM | #42 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
|
|
August 31st, 2010, 12:41 PM | #43 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 46
|
Thanks, Raymond. I just needed a little nudge to go over the edge and make the purchase. I appreciate your input.
|
September 2nd, 2010, 10:25 AM | #44 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 21
|
Tilt lock/ ball joint lock on 561bhdv?
I just purchased the 561bhdv to use with my 7D for use in tight spaces and I wasn't expecting the monopod to tilt so easily (I guess I didn't do enough research!). Is there a way to lock the ball joint so that the monopod doesn't tilt so easily? Or, do you find that you can get steady footage holding the monopod? I did tighten the base using an allen wrench but that's about it so far. Thanks for your input!
Michael Michael and Tricia Films
__________________
www.michaelandtriciafilms.com |
September 2nd, 2010, 11:19 AM | #45 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Because the monopod comes shipped so stiff, we've loosened the joint and sprayed wd-40 on the ball to get it nice and smooth. |
|
| ||||||
|
|