|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 2nd, 2010, 12:23 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 107
|
SDXC Card with Canon t2i
Has anyone had any success with SDXC cards on the t2i yet? Still a little unclear about the exFAT format allowing more than 4gb/12min limitation.
Last edited by Tony Nguyen; March 2nd, 2010 at 12:27 PM. Reason: For being stupid |
March 2nd, 2010, 12:56 PM | #2 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
It's important to understand that the 4GB / 12 minute HD / 30 minute SD clip length limit is *not* related to anything having to do with the choice of cards or the choice of file format. Therefore the clip length limitation cannot be overcome simply by using an SDXC card, sorry.
|
March 2nd, 2010, 01:05 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 107
|
Hmm. I see.... That explains this from http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eo...ml#post1492629
|
March 2nd, 2010, 01:29 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 78
|
Also, there are no SDXC cards widely available for sale yet. There have been a couple of announced products, 64GB, with MSRPs around $350.
__________________
Current cameras: Canon EOS Digital Rebel T2i (coming soon) | Panasonic LUMIX DMC-GH1 | Sony HDR-SR11 (infrared modded) |
March 2nd, 2010, 09:26 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 148
|
The technical limit was overcome with solid state camcorders and now the SDXC cards. The EU tax code limit has not been overcome. Although I'm surprised some hacker has not hacked it.
|
March 2nd, 2010, 10:06 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: montreal
Posts: 170
|
I don't see much of sdxc in Montreal.
and the biggest store of the province does not sell them yet. |
March 3rd, 2010, 10:27 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Melrose Park, Illinois, USA
Posts: 936
|
Much of the reason for such a recording limit on large-sensor motion-recording-capable cameras such as the T2i is heat. All else being equal, larger sensors produce much more heat than smaller sensors do. This is why even the most expensive professional solid-state camcorders use only so-called 2/3" (two-thirds) sensors (the actual usable size, or effective size, of a 2/3" sensor is a bit less than that) while the T2i's sensor measures more than one full inch on the diagonal (effective size). There is no getting around the increased heat output with bigger sensors, which run exponentially hotter than their smaller counterparts. Therefore, Canon actually implemented the 4GB/12-minute limit on video recordings in the T2i in order to protect the camera's imaging sensor - and then, the camera must be turned off for a few minutes before continuing to record. Otherwise, if left to record indefinitely, the sensor would have burnt out after about 15 to 20 minutes, rendering the camera inoperable.
|
March 5th, 2010, 01:51 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,531
|
It only takes a few seconds to start another 4GB/12min take once the previous once has finished. There is no question of turning the camera off for several minutes (unless you choose to).
|
June 8th, 2010, 09:56 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 244
|
I am buying a T2i and am trying to figure out what would be a better purchase. The Sandisk Class 4 64gb SDXC cards are selling for about $219 now on amazon. However, I could buy two of the Sandisk Class 10 16gb SDHC cards for $190. The small price difference is not a factor either way. My question is, would it be safer to get the two 16gb cards, since they're Class 10, even though I would only have half the storage capacity? I'll be using the T2i to videotape weddings, and since this is not my A camera, 96 minutes (4gb = 12 minutes) should be plenty. Obviously it's my goal to get a couple more cards in the future. My other two video cameras are HDV (miniDV).
__________________
www.clarkvideoproductions.com |
June 8th, 2010, 09:58 AM | #10 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
Card capacity isn't as important as card speed, since it's a quick and painless process to simply swap out a full card for an empty one. |
|
June 8th, 2010, 11:44 AM | #11 |
Tourist
Join Date: May 2010
Location: bethesda
Posts: 4
|
I feel I'd be better to go with the class 10 so there isn't any problems with buffer overflowing and video randomly freezing. Also higher densities could have more defects and lead to problems. So multiple cards could reduce data loss if it happens
|
June 8th, 2010, 11:39 PM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1,158
|
EU import tax is based on record length of 29 min, 29 secs.
there is NOTHING that prevents canon from lifting this for t2i / NA cameras, except its cheaper to make one camera body for everywhere, instead of loading different firmware for different models... which of course some one would "fix". canon could let the camera support HFS+ or EXT3 or EXT4 if the wanted to, which would also eliminate the problem. FAT64.... its just too new. |
June 9th, 2010, 10:50 AM | #13 | ||
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
*only reason* why these cameras are saddled with the 4GB recording limit. The files are cut off at 29 min, 59 secs of standard definition video or 4GB, whichever limit is reached first. 4GB = approximately twelve minutes of HD video (sometimes more, sometimes less... depends on what's being shot). Quote:
The recording time limitation on these cameras is not twelve minutes -- it's thirty minutes. In SD recording mode, you can record a single clip up to 29 min. 59 sec. in length before the camera automatically stops recording. That translates to approximately twelve minutes of HD (maybe more, maybe less, depending on what the camera is pointing at). Due to the EU tax provisions which have been discussed here many times, the camera cuts off at 29 min. 59 sec. or 4GB, whichever comes first. In HD mode, 4GB is always reached well before the 29 min. 59 sec. time limit. Hope this helps, |
||
June 12th, 2010, 05:30 AM | #14 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,531
|
Quote:
The resolution limit of 800x600 means that any length of standard definition recording is permissible without being classed as a camcorder & is presumably set higher than 640x480 as SD PAL is 720x576. It's not clear where a limit of 12 minutes or 4GB is arrived at as neither figures as part of the EU definition of a camcorder. Whatever the reason for the limit we appear stuck with it & I like the suggestion that the limited recording time ensures that we have an experience more akin to using 35mm film:-) Last edited by Nigel Barker; June 12th, 2010 at 07:21 AM. Reason: Clarification |
|
September 7th, 2010, 03:10 PM | #15 |
Tourist
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 2
|
solution to record limit
Is there a solution yet to overcome the 30min / 4gb movie record limit?
|
| ||||||
|
|