|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 3rd, 2010, 02:56 AM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
The idea is right: avoid too much detail to avoid aliasing. The items were just a bit out of order...
More detail -> aliasing -> more stress on the codec. The aliasing is bad enough. And the extra stress on the codec doesn't help matters.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
March 3rd, 2010, 04:15 PM | #17 | |
Sponsor: Schneider Optics
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
I am working on some tests. If anybody is here in Los Angeles and would like to offer up some time and a Canon 5D MKII or other video capable SLR to work with me in person on tests I will be more than happy to do so. Ryan Avery Schneider Optics |
|
March 3rd, 2010, 04:17 PM | #18 | |
Sponsor: Schneider Optics
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
The Digicon affects both ends of the dynamic range. Ryan Avery Schneider Optics |
|
March 4th, 2010, 02:56 AM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 969
|
Ryan, send me the filters, I'd be happy to conduct an independent test for you. I mean that sincerely.
Liam. |
March 4th, 2010, 04:53 AM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: East Bay Cali
Posts: 563
|
That is the first thing i thought of, why is the exposure so high, cause the rest looks ok, then when you lose the shadows, just contrast it. but from the look of it the first thing is it is way to hot. or else the poor kid aint getting enough sun :-) call out !Make-UP! and see what your budget is :-)
__________________
----------------sig----------------- Re-learning everything all over again, one more time. |
| ||||||
|
|