|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 21st, 2010, 09:04 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Zonhoven
Posts: 153
|
lens too fast ??
Hi,
I have already a 7D and I use my old nikon primes on it. Now I will be buying another 7D and maybe with original canon lenses. Everybody is saying the best is the 1.2, but do you film a lot on f1,2 ? I do a lot of wedding reports and sometimes f1,4 is already too shallow. Which lens do you suggest ? The f1,2 is too expensive, so what do you think about the 50mm f1.8 ? Is that a good alternative ? |
January 21st, 2010, 10:26 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 80
|
I was close to buying the Canon 50mm f1.2 but decided to settle on the 50mm f1.4 instead. I was using a friends f1.8 which was ok but the 1.4 was the one for me. The 1.2 got such bad reviews, it was a no brainer (for me).
|
January 21st, 2010, 10:55 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 72
|
I would have to say, go for the 1.4, you will have over all happiness with that one, the 1.8 has its moments and the 1.4 is at a reasonable price too
|
January 21st, 2010, 07:50 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
No, it's terrible. The manual focus ring is not a ring at all, but an instrument of torture sent by Canon to punish those who focus manually. The Canon 50mm f/1.4 is OK, but the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 is better still.
|
January 22nd, 2010, 09:25 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Queretaro, Mexico
Posts: 40
|
Hello Bart, could you tell us what adaptor are you using for your nikon lenses? and how do they work on the 7D?
Thanks
__________________
Manuel Hernandez-Stumpfhauser Director Oxes Tv |
January 22nd, 2010, 05:46 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Zonhoven
Posts: 153
|
Hey Manuel,
I have the adapter from Cinevate (Cinevate: DSLR Rigs, Camera Sliders, Follow Focus and More). It's kinda cheap and I think it's good value for money. |
January 26th, 2010, 04:25 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 69
|
Get the Sigma 30mm 1.4 or even better, the Canon 24mm 1.4.
1.4 is almost a full stop faster than 1.8 and with a wider lens, your DOF won't be as shallow. Here's a great online resource for calculating the DOF for any camera or lens combination: Online Depth of Field Calculator |
January 26th, 2010, 04:54 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
January 26th, 2010, 07:17 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 69
|
The difference between 1.8 and 1.4 is 2/3 of a stop. Do you disagree with that?
|
January 26th, 2010, 07:36 PM | #10 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Ohg my goodness.... you're absolutely right... my mistake.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
January 26th, 2010, 09:57 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 69
|
I've seen your posts around, Perrone, and I know you're a knowledgeable guy. You had me second guessing myself. :)
So, to reiterate, Bart: Get something fast and wide. And yes, there's a big difference between 1.8 and 1.4. At 1.4, 67% more light is reaching the sensor. |
| ||||||
|
|