|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 1st, 2009, 04:12 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Umeå, Sweden
Posts: 84
|
Good wide lens for 7D?
Hi guys,
I've got a 7D and will mainly use it for filming. At the present I have a Sigma 18-50 mm f2.8 and the kit lens Canon 18-135 mm. I also have the cheap Canon 50 mm f1.8 (which is my favorite lens). So... I realize that I would prefer non-zoom lenses, and will probably buy a Zeiss 50 mm f1.4. But I also need a more zoomed lens - which might be the Samyang MF 85/1,4. BUT... i also need a good wide angle lens with minimal distortion. What are your recommendations? |
December 1st, 2009, 05:24 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Malmo Sweden
Posts: 103
|
if you can get an used leica 19mm it is the more rectilinear wide angle lens i´ve ever seen, with a fantastic sharpness and color rendition. The new price is very high but you should be able to find an used one in good shape for a fair price.
|
December 1st, 2009, 07:03 AM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, Texas U.S.A
Posts: 1,117
|
Joachim
Tokina 11-16mm contant f2.8. Used it, and its bright and minimal distortion and CA. Ted |
December 1st, 2009, 07:08 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bristol, CT (Home of EPSN)
Posts: 1,192
|
I love my Sigma 10-20mm. Real sharp.
|
December 1st, 2009, 07:14 AM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, Texas U.S.A
Posts: 1,117
|
Paul,
I also have that but its not as fast as the tokina. If my memory serves me right, too lazy to check, its 3.5 -5.6 ? after the 11-16mm if i need a closer fov, i use the 20-40mm sigma which is also constant 2.8 then a 50mm. Ted |
December 1st, 2009, 09:18 AM | #6 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Don't overlook the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM. Basically it's a 16-35mm with the EF-S mount.
|
December 1st, 2009, 12:41 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: St Paul MN
Posts: 41
|
The Tokina 11-16mm is the only constant aperture wide angle zoom I know of. It is also the only EF-S lens I cared to buy. For normal and telephoto applications, fast primes are the way to go for video if you want the maximum in low light/bokeh.
|
December 1st, 2009, 06:37 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 136
|
I was looking for a good zoom to compliment my set of primes. I was comparing the Tokina 16-50 2.8 and the Tamron 17-50 2.8. After a lot of research and reading reviews online I went with the Tamron. It is reported to have less CA than the Tokina and a bit sharper. I never did a side by side but I shot some tests today and I'm really happy with the results. Sharp clean images. If you can live with an EF-S lens its a great deal.
__________________
Mike A |
December 1st, 2009, 07:10 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 344
|
Quote:
Did you mean to say, Don't overlook the Canon EF-S "16-35mm" f/3.5-4.5 USM. Basically it's a "10-22mm" EF...?
__________________
boxoutsidemedia.com |
|
December 1st, 2009, 07:43 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milan/Italy
Posts: 63
|
Don't look anything different than the Tokina 11-16 (if you need that fof).
It has also been converted to cinema lens with PL mount for a reason. BTW I like my samyang 85f1.4 a lot (for video. for stills probably you'll see it isn't the Zeiss nor the Nikkor)
__________________
vimeo.com/alvisetedesco web.mac.com/alvise.tedesco/DP/home |
December 2nd, 2009, 12:04 AM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, Texas U.S.A
Posts: 1,117
|
He meant that with the 1.6x crop factor the 10-22 becomes essentially 16-35. just as a 50mm due to crop factor in the 7D's sensor essentially looks like an 80mm fov.
|
December 2nd, 2009, 01:08 AM | #12 |
Tourist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: kwa-zulu-natal
Posts: 2
|
Tokina 11-16mm built like a tank, really sharp, ordered mine from japan, came really fast from ogt-clan.com
|
December 2nd, 2009, 01:49 AM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Umeå, Sweden
Posts: 84
|
Thanks a lot, guys! There are quite some interesting lenses there! Especially the Tokina... Is this one: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc..._AT_X_116.html
BUT, I'm a bit surprised that most of you are recommending zoom wide angle lenses. I was under the assumption that fixed lenses would be preferred for filming... Am I wrong? |
December 2nd, 2009, 05:40 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Beijing
Posts: 665
|
Joachim,
I was probably the first person to buy and recommend the Tokina 11-16mm for 7D use and I stand by that. The Canon 10-22 is very nice but as others here have pointed out it is not f2.8. Also the Tokina has a much better manual focus ring than the Canon which makes life a lot easier if you want to run and gun. At the wide end there are really few fixed focal length lenses that are not fisheyes, the only corrected choices are really 14mm f2.8's from Canon, Nikon, Sigma and soon I believe Samyang. Fixed lenses usually perform better optically than their zoom counterparts but recent advances in wide angle lens design have seen lenses like the Nikon 14-24 f2.8 and this Tokina being able to hold their own against all but the very best fixed lenses. Dan Last edited by Dan Chung; December 2nd, 2009 at 10:02 AM. |
December 2nd, 2009, 09:00 AM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Umeå, Sweden
Posts: 84
|
Okay... Seems like it would be a zoom wide angle lens then.
I was talking to my camera supplier today - and they checked with the importing agency for Tokina in Sweden. Looks like Tokina are having trouble delivering... At the moment they are talking about delivering at spring time. Even at B&S:s website there are no Tokina 11-16 mm in stock. Bummer! |
| ||||||
|
|