|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 22nd, 2009, 10:32 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 72
|
IS lense useless?
I heard IS is useless in video, and then someone said it was everything. Can someone give me a clear answer. Im trying to decide between the two lenses and the IS is obviously more but if i dont have to spend the extra money im not going to
-Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS -Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L thanks in advance |
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2009, 10:58 PM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 72
|
nevermind, i found an answer to my question
|
|
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2009, 11:04 PM
|
#3 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 12
|
Not sure what the answer was that you found, but I have the 17-55 IS and when handholding at the telephoto end if I don't use stabilization my shots are too shaky. I really like IS -- makes a big difference for me. If you don't handhold, and use tripod mostly, then IS might not matter too much.
|
|
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2009, 11:17 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 634
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23rd, 2009, 01:05 AM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 72
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
