|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 27th, 2010, 03:42 PM | #46 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 34
|
7D + 17-55IS + Merlin
I have a nice balance going with the Merlin, 7D, 17-55IS, and the Canon lens hood. Parameters set for 17mm:
Spar opened to one line shy of max opening (1) mid + 1 finish on the front (1) start + (2) mid + 1 (finish) on the bottom Camera mounted in Hole "M" on mounting plate mounting plate registering at "-0.75" mark The L-R adjuster is almost totally to the Right The F-R adjuster is about 3/4 forward Obviously the fine adjusters take some tweaking, but both have play and work well. I tried 3 Mid weights on the bottom, but it was too bottom heavy and had a pendulum effect. Going back to 2 mid weights gave me the 1 sec drop and very smooth action. Hopefully this can help anyone get in the ballpark with this combo. |
August 28th, 2010, 01:05 PM | #47 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
Canon 7D and Canon 17-55mm IS plus Merlin Steadicam
Hi Nathanael,
You're right! Curiosity got the better of me so I just tried your setup with my 7D and Canon 17-55mm IS set at 17mm, focussed at about 1.5m (but in my case with a cheap Marumi 83-J hood on plus a filter on the front of the lens). Got the Merlin Steadicam balanced in a just a few seconds with no problems at all. I will say it seems much, much heaver than flying with the Canon 10-22mm on (so I'll probably stick with that for my main flying stuff as it covers the same focal range). However, I imagine it might be less susceptible to light breezes when outside. Seems an excellent start point (really stable!) so thanks for posting!
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production Last edited by Andy Wilkinson; August 28th, 2010 at 02:09 PM. Reason: typo! |
August 29th, 2010, 09:57 AM | #48 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 34
|
Andy,
Glad it worked for you - these things really ought to be fairly repeatable! Your reply did make me realize that I also have a UV filter on the front and I forgot to list that. The camera, lens and lens hood are around 3.5lbs. I don't have the 10-22, to compare weight, but it isn't for indefinite use for sure... That's why they make the vests, I'm sure. |
February 5th, 2011, 11:25 PM | #49 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 32
|
Thanks
Was considering Merlin to replace my glidecam 2000 pro. Still undecided but lots of great material here.
|
February 6th, 2011, 05:14 AM | #50 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
Hi Patrick,
Yep, DVinfo is the place to look for anything Video related for sure! The Merlin gets better and better with lots of practice (doesn't everything!). There are a few shots using the Merlin/Canon 7D in my new showreel (it's on my website if your interested) which shows I'm getting better at it - I hope! Many talk of the Blackbird being an easier stabiliser to master than the Merlin but I'm very happy I went with the Merlin - albeit it still frustrates me at times - less and less now. Which stabiliser is one of those really difficult choices that many seem to agonise over - good luck in choosing what's right for you but be aware it's very susceptible to breezes as mentioned a bit earlier. But since you already have it, what is not working for you with the Glidecam 2000 Pro that you think a Merlin might fix? On a side note, I spent many happy years doing a different kind of flying - into STL on business from the UK every few weeks. Used to hang out a lot in Riddles Penultimate and a few other bars and restaurants on "The Loop" in University City. Hope they are still as good/still going strong!
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production |
| ||||||
|
|