|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 18th, 2009, 07:58 PM | #31 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,290
|
Quote:
|
|
November 23rd, 2009, 01:45 PM | #32 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
What parameter do you use in streamclip when you usae the dnxhd?? Thank you |
|
November 23rd, 2009, 02:16 PM | #33 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Hmm, that's odd. I never have that trouble on any of the three machines I do this on. In MpegStreamclip:
I select DNxHD, usually use DNxHD 175x if I am bringing masters into Vegas, or DNxHD 36 if I am doing proxies. Make sure the interlacing option is turned off. Other than that, I just let it do the render and it comes into Vegas perfect. I do this in Vegas 9, Vegas 8.0c and Vegas 8.1. And right now on my timeline are DNxHD files I used Mpeg streamclip to convert from the 5D.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
November 23rd, 2009, 02:27 PM | #34 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 216
|
dnxhd and vegas
Where do I find the "175x" value? (I do not have access to my workstation right now where streamclip is installed).
Thank you. Carlo |
November 23rd, 2009, 02:29 PM | #35 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
If you select DNxHD in Mpeg Streamclip, there will be a button for options right next to it. This will bring up a list of all the different options for bitrates you can use.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
November 23rd, 2009, 02:40 PM | #36 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 216
|
dnxHD
Thank you so much. I will try again this pm.
Carlo |
November 23rd, 2009, 02:42 PM | #37 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 216
|
dnxHD
|
November 23rd, 2009, 02:51 PM | #38 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
It has no bearing on the DNxHD codec.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
November 23rd, 2009, 02:56 PM | #39 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 216
|
dnxHD
The "Options" pop up window has a glitch. How do I get to the bit rate?
Thank you |
November 23rd, 2009, 03:03 PM | #40 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 216
|
Ok
I go it...Thank you
|
December 10th, 2009, 01:21 PM | #41 |
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4
|
streamclip comparison
Hi guys
So i converted a clip with streamclip using DNxHD codec setting 1080p 23.97 10-bit and it seems to look a bit faded compared to the original. It still isn't smooth in Premiere CS4. I found that if you drop the 7D original clips on the premiere timeline and render timeline, the footage runs smooth on my Quad core 2.4 ghz. Can i just render time line and work with originals or am I getting a quality hit once i color grade? |
December 10th, 2009, 01:59 PM | #42 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
It looks "faded" because DNxHD is set up for legal NTSC / PAL color and luminance. If your originals fall outside of the legal ranges, then you'll see this on your computer screen. What does the signal look like on the scopes? That is the accurate reference. Computer monitors make AWFUL judges of color and luminance for video.
I also wouldn't expect it to run smoothly if you are using DNxHD 175x. That is a LOAD for most computers to carry. Especially at 1080p. The 7D is running at less than 1/3 the bit rate (though with a tougher codec). Generally, you edit with the DNxHD 36 on the timeline, and use the 175x for mastering. In terms of a quality hit, yea, the difference between the DNx and the original files is massive.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
December 31st, 2009, 02:42 PM | #43 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
I wanted to update this. This is in fact, not correct. The quality slider should ALWAYS be at 100%. It does make a difference. I was able to see it clearly in some night scenes I was working on.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
December 31st, 2009, 03:31 PM | #44 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,290
|
Quote:
I also get the aforementioned luminance hit in the 709 space. |
|
January 11th, 2010, 05:05 AM | #45 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
On the other hand the original looks exactly the same as on my camera's lcd which is exactly how i would like it to look. Something strange happens later when i export finished edit back to DNxHD. The footage bec omes even brighter. Anyone knows what is going on? |
|
| ||||||
|
|