|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 21st, 2009, 08:52 PM | #31 | ||
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
Current thread Title:
Smaller sensors do not have deeper DOF Statement from prior thread: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Jeff Donald Carpe Diem Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Where to Buy? From the best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
||
October 21st, 2009, 09:07 PM | #32 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
Quote:
I still don't see where the confusion is. Both statements are correct and happily coexist. Large sensors are indeed capable of both the same DOF as well as thinner DOF. |
|
October 21st, 2009, 09:43 PM | #33 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brisbane, California
Posts: 530
|
I, for one appreciate this thread. Thanks Daniel, for the insight here. I guess gather that your point is, if you can afford it and don't need a tiny camcorder, you're not giving up any advantages by getting the largest sensor camcorder possible.
If you get a large sensor camcorder, and wind up stopping it down to get the most DOF you can, are you risking a soft image because of diffraction? I experience a big drop in image quality with my EX1 when I go above 5.6 or so. With a larger sensor is less of an issue? Thanks again. |
October 21st, 2009, 11:31 PM | #34 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
Thanks, Keith.
Quote:
It will be less of an issue at the same f-number. But it will be the same issue at the same DOF. Essentially, the relationship between DOF and diffraction is the same for all sensor sizes. |
|
| ||||||
|
|