|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 18th, 2009, 07:57 AM | #46 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38
|
|
September 18th, 2009, 09:20 AM | #47 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 706
|
I do agree that the APS-C size is likely to become a standard. While a still photog can take multiple exposure to get correct focus with very thin DOF, a videographer usually doesn't have that option. For my taste the most common elegant way to use DOF control with people is to soften the background while still maintaining a sense of place.
I find lack of 25p truly bizarre. I thought Japan was PAL? How an large, international company decides to exclude the standard for a large part of the world is very strange. |
September 18th, 2009, 09:33 AM | #48 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 579
|
Too true, thx.
Yea Don its strange how they left it out of the 5d in the first place. That cam would have sold like hotcakes around here. I would have bought one in a flash. It has been so annoying watching all this lovely footage on the net coming from the states and not being able to be a part of it. |
September 18th, 2009, 09:56 AM | #49 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 1,104
|
That's a great way to define an appropriate use of depth of field. A "sense of place" helps establish the shot location for example. Very shallow depth of field can be useful when it's appropriate to completely obscure a distracting or ugly background but can be out of place if there isn't a clear reason for using it.
|
September 18th, 2009, 10:26 AM | #50 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Nope. Japan is primarily a 60 Hz country.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
September 18th, 2009, 03:36 PM | #51 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 969
|
No difference in exposure at all. But a difference in field of view.
|
September 18th, 2009, 08:29 PM | #52 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Quote:
In practice, I don't expect that I'd kick the 7D out of my bag for noise though...
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
September 19th, 2009, 05:59 AM | #53 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 52
|
I look at 5d footage against (the limited) currently available 7d stuff...it looks great but is it just me or do the skintones look better on 5d?..i can look at 5d footage and say .."thats 5d and its really nice"...7d i look at and say"nice...that adapter looks good in low light"
I would buy a 5d over 7d tomorrow if only it shot 25p for europe |
September 19th, 2009, 06:05 AM | #54 | |
Wizard Status
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 239
|
While they do use NTSC-J (PAL black and blanking, different channel stepping, but otherwise NTSC) across the entire country, the mains frequency in Japan is not consistent:
Quote:
|
|
September 21st, 2009, 09:40 AM | #55 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockledge, Florida
Posts: 351
|
Quote:
|
|
March 18th, 2010, 05:06 AM | #56 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 29
|
I own the 5D mk2 that i have just upgraded to v2.03 and now shoots 24,25,30. this makes it almost perfect. i have been using the clients 7D which that did over heat, i would only purchase a 7D if i needed 50p, the 5D has such low noise and a cracking picture even at iso of 2500, do this with the 7D and your results would be seriously degraded.
__________________
www.iceboxvideo.co.uk |
March 18th, 2010, 12:43 PM | #57 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 1,589
|
Yes David, it is so nice to at last have that 25P! Madness that we all had to wait so long for it to begin to show up on DSLR cameras...
|
October 1st, 2010, 05:22 AM | #58 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 9
|
I know this is reviving a very old thread but I'm wondering if anyone things there is any hope at all to ever get 60 fps on the 5d MK II via firmware? Or is the hardware just not capable?
Also what makes the 7d "easier to focus"? |
October 3rd, 2010, 11:48 AM | #59 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
In answer to the question "What makes the 7D easier to focus?"
It's simply that (ALL other things being equal - same lens/F stop etc.) the 7D, with it's smaller "cropped" sensor exhibits a slightly deeper depth of field compared to the depth of field that the Canon 5DMkII's full frame sensor would give. Bottom line = more tolerance/room for error by the user trying to focus on that tiny LCD on the back. That's physics at work!
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production |
October 3rd, 2010, 12:16 PM | #60 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
The autofocus system in the 7D is significantly better than the one in the 5D, but that is only helpful for stills - does not help at all with manual focusing for video.
|
| ||||||
|
|