|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 5th, 2013, 11:34 AM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Posts: 309
|
Re: C100: Lenses loose?
Just checked my c100 for this, sold as a rock.
There is a tiny but of give in terms of rotating the lens (in the same way you would when you take a lens off) but in terms of 'in and out' movement (as seen in your video) there is none. So if canon is telling you that this is normal, then my and Andy's C100 are not normal (in that our do not move) |
August 8th, 2013, 03:43 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 78
|
Re: C100: Lenses loose?
This post caused me to try out all my lenses on my C100...from Canon L glass to vintage Pentax Super-Takumars with Fotodiox adapters, from wide zooms to 300mm primes...everything feels and looks solid on my unit. There is a tiny amount of play - 0.25mm? - that you need to really push against the lens to feel, but certainly nothing that affects image quality or framing. Just another data point for the ongoing discussion.
__________________
designer of media for eyes and ears sound design and field recording at http://www.noisejockey.net/blog |
August 9th, 2013, 01:16 AM | #18 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,393
|
Re: C100: Lenses loose?
That's ridiculous ...
If that was a manual lens that movement would show, surely? |
August 10th, 2013, 02:06 AM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: N. Ireland
Posts: 370
|
Re: C100: Lenses loose?
Nope, it doesn't show. You'd have to put a lot of force on it and be very heavy handed to create any movement during normal use.
|
| ||||||
|
|