|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 19th, 2014, 08:33 AM | #31 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,006
|
Re: C100 very noisy
And the image being nosier is a common complaint by people who purchased a Ninja.
|
June 19th, 2014, 12:27 PM | #32 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Luis Obispo CA
Posts: 1,195
|
Re: C100 very noisy
Try as I may, Gary, I'm unable to find a consensus (or nary a peep) of discussion that the Ninja when used with the C100 produces a noisier result.
What I did find was Paul Joy's nice review of this combination, and the side by side comparisons he posted of AVCHD vs the Ninja. In all 4 comparison shots there is a negligible difference between the images in terms of noise, and in almost all the shots there is a slight advantage to the Ninja version in the relative smoothness of the grain pattern. I'll exit this discussion by saying that this matches up exactly with what I see on my C300 and the samurai blade. Atomos Ninja 2 review with Canon C100 | Paul Joy – Freelance Filmmaker Barry |
August 1st, 2014, 03:41 AM | #33 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 94
|
Re: C100 very noisy
FYI Canon is releasing/released the xf200 which should improve the low light capabilities of the xf line of cameras.
Check it out: canon xf200 | B&H Photo Video
__________________
brianbechard.com |
| ||||||
|
|