September 11th, 2012, 01:30 PM | #91 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vastervik ,Sweden
Posts: 639
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
I wounding what UW housing they was using ('caz all shoots was from the C100, right?). Is the gates housing supporting C100 too !?!
|
September 11th, 2012, 02:33 PM | #92 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 243
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
I imagine they just adapted the one for the 300/500
|
September 11th, 2012, 02:33 PM | #93 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 913
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
It depends on your line of work. For my line of work I've been very happy to have slow-motion at my disposal. Real slow-motion has such a different look then post slow mo. I'm not happy this cam doesn't have 60P but the resolution for me, nd filters, sensor size, and price is worth sacrificing slow-mo. It may not be for others. It's a tough call. My AF100 does not meet the resolution nor sensor size I can with the C100. No win for this next season for me. Oh well. In the end it's a tool. Others have specific needs then others.
|
September 11th, 2012, 03:22 PM | #94 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 243
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
my main line of questioning is why 60p is better than 60i for slow mo.
|
September 11th, 2012, 05:37 PM | #95 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 420
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
60i isn't slow motion, it's interlaced.
__________________
http://www.markoconnell.org |
September 11th, 2012, 05:52 PM | #96 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 913
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
Also I believe all LCD/Plasma displays are progressive not interlaced. So to use 60i as slow mo you're using 1920X540 once interpolated instead of getting a full 1920X1080 with 60P. You're losing resolution with 60i once using it for slowmo.
|
September 11th, 2012, 07:13 PM | #97 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 243
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
|
September 12th, 2012, 03:51 AM | #98 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
Re: Canon EOS C100 & Atomos Ninja 2
I liked the last line best!
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production |
September 12th, 2012, 12:11 PM | #99 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 240
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
Where do you see this, btw? They look like loupes to me. Or is that what you mean? (doesn't seem particularly significant if it is). Maybe I missed something.
|
September 13th, 2012, 03:33 PM | #100 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
Re: Canon EOS C100 and Zacuto Z-Finder
Looks like Zacuto have all their add ons already covered/tuned for the C100.
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production |
September 13th, 2012, 10:49 PM | #101 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 420
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
True true true...
__________________
http://www.markoconnell.org |
September 14th, 2012, 04:37 AM | #102 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,596
|
Re: Canon EOS C100 and Zacuto Z-Finder
|
September 14th, 2012, 05:52 AM | #103 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
Re: Canon EOS C100 and Zacuto Z-Finder
Quote:
Although I normally prefer a shoulder mount, I think the C100 is small enough to pull off this style of design, just a shame they deliberately crippled it with a small EVF and consumer codec when the far cheaper XF100 has 50Mbps 4:2:2. Clearly they are protecting the C300 but makes you wonder what the difference in production cost is between a C100 and C300. It makes the C300 price hike seem very steep.
__________________
www.mikemarriage.com |
|
September 14th, 2012, 06:43 AM | #104 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,531
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
The EVF & screen look very like the ones on the XF100 & the EVF on that is pretty useless. In fact I just looked up the specifications & while they are identical in size 0.24" EVF & 3.5" screen the EVF on the C100 does have a higher resolution at 960x540 versus 640x480 on the XF100.
|
September 14th, 2012, 06:59 AM | #105 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
Re: Canon EOS C100
I agree, have an XF100 as a little C cam and although I like it, the EVF is one of the weakest aspects. Hopefully the C100's is significantly better.
__________________
www.mikemarriage.com |
| ||||||
|
|