|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 20th, 2012, 06:21 AM | #16 |
Telecam Films
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 723
|
Re: Is exposing C-log different than usual?
Probably one of the most requested firmware tweak at this point. This will be very handy indeed, and once they fix this, I'll likely use the ISO wheel much more than I use the iris one. As a workaround, I mapped the MAG button #1 as ISO control, works quite well.
|
March 20th, 2012, 01:03 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 112
|
Re: Is exposing C-log different than usual?
That's exactly what I've done as well. I just want an easier way to change color temp.
|
March 20th, 2012, 03:33 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washoe Valley, NV
Posts: 304
|
Re: Is exposing C-log different than usual?
having used the C300 for a couple of shoots now, I think I can confirm that placing skin tones around 60IRE max is correct. using the waveform, I have been setting skin tones closer to 65+IRE, (which is what I have been used to with my Sony) and this has resulted in things being just a bit overexposed. from now on I'm going off the waveform at no more than 60IRE for skin tone. (this also seems consistent with the false color on my monitor)
__________________
www.zooprax.com |
March 26th, 2012, 07:37 PM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,684
|
Re: Is exposing C-log different than usual?
I wouldn't trust Marshall for skin tone info. I saw an early version of the false color at a trade show 2-3 years ago and the flesh tone was set at 80! I took the rep aside and told them they were way off and he brought me over to their tech guy at the show who didn't have a clue. They changed it afterward to 55 - which I thought was too low.
I like 60-65 but people use their zebras a little differently anyway. |
March 27th, 2012, 05:32 PM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 112
|
Re: Is exposing C-log different than usual?
Hopefully their actual engineers are more in touch than their trade show tech guy.
Good point on using zebras. I am interested to know how you use yours at 60-65. When I had my EX1 zebras at 56, I would place zebras on the brightest part of light skinned peoples' faces. Again, I was happy with the results but maybe I was slightly underexposed. Either way, we need expanded capabilities in the firmware. Here's a new one: when using aspect markers on the LCD, it would be nice to have the option to black out the video at the top and bottom. It would still record the full frame to the cards/outputs but it would be easier to frame things in camera. |
April 22nd, 2013, 10:33 AM | #21 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Aspen, CO
Posts: 5
|
Is exposing C-log , setting zebras
Hi All,
Just took delivery on my Canon C100 and a Ninja2. ( delivered in a rush. Grateful to Joe at Abel, LA) My first shoot in a couple of days will be interviews against a white background cyc, high key lighting. I want the background to be textureless white (100% ?) Having never done this, I could use some clarity on setting up zebras and exposure for my interviewees. Also, any advice for a first user of the Ninja2? I plan to shoot in 24P (60i) 24Mbps. I plan to use an "interrotron" setup with an iKann iPad teleprompter.- hoping the interviewers face will be visible in this rig...given the bright studio. Have any of you shot with this high key look?. I'd be interested in any advice. Thanks! (Alister- I enjoyed your presentations at NAB this year. Great info. Did I hear that you are publishing camera profiles for the Canons as well as for the Sonys?) Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|