January 26th, 2004, 08:00 PM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,707
|
US Dept. of Justice investigating Blu-Ray
FYI - hope this speeds up and doesn't hurt HD-DVD!
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...01252222000440
__________________
Christopher C. Murphy Director, Producer, Writer |
January 27th, 2004, 07:23 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 1,034
|
The DOJ just doesn't seem to learn when it comes to these things. They should be attacking the MPAA over copy protection, not Sony over trying to set a standard.
|
January 27th, 2004, 07:34 AM | #3 | |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Quote:
|
|
January 27th, 2004, 03:32 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 1,034
|
And beta actually was the superior standard (as recognized by broadcasters) and blue-ray is too.
|
January 27th, 2004, 07:30 PM | #5 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Well, yes. BETA was superior but Sony either didn't want to share it or wanted too much money from other cam makers, from what I recall. That was the issue which lead it to failure.
|
January 27th, 2004, 09:29 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 389
|
I second that, Frank. JVC sold VHS product rights to other companies like it was going out of style. Hence, lower price, higher availability.
__________________
Nicholi Brossia |
January 29th, 2004, 07:57 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 1,034
|
Ok sure, but you know, if they go with WM9, they've got the same problem from Microsoft. So if you're going to trust a giant, why not trust the one who's overing the disk with more long term beenfits? That's clearly blu-ray. Even if we don't need 30 GB today, we will tomorrow. DVD-9 can't last forever.
|
| ||||||
|
|