|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 9th, 2008, 03:09 PM | #76 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Healdsburg, California
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
But then I saw it again a few weeks ago on TV. I suspect it has to do with how much I've changed over the years, but I saw the movie in an entirely different way, and I would almost want to say that I now feel it is one of the best films of the genre, if not for the fact that such a statement would be almost completely misunderstood by many fans fans of sci-fi and horror. I felt that if I strip away the basic elements of sci-fi, and overlook the shocks, the scares, the horrors, and the blood,... it's almost a chick-flick - in a bitterly twisted sort of way. It is actually quite a tragic commentary on human exploitation and the resulting suffering, as well as an examination of maternal bonds and the basic instinct to survive. Some of those were certainly touched on in various ways in the earlier Alien films, but the maternal aspects were considerably amplified in Resurrection. I wonder how much of those elements were magnified by intent through Sigourney Weaver's additional role as co-producer. -Jon
__________________
"Are we to go on record, sir, with our assertion that the 'pink hearts, yellow moons, orange stars, and green clovers' are, in point of fact', magically delicious?" - Walter Hollarhan before the House Subcommittee on Integrity in Advertising - May, 1974 |
|
January 9th, 2008, 03:47 PM | #77 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 259
|
I liked Resurrection. It was disgusting and disturbing and it wasnt bad for a 3rd sequel as they were getting themselves in a corner narratively speaking after killing of the main character, so cloning was a pretty good way out of it. And they had talked about studying the alien since the firct one so it had to happen some time.
The perverse thing is that no "normal" human survived. You had a cripple, a psychopath, an android and a genetically engineered crossbreed. Good ol Dr. Phibes. To me the 60s to 70s were the classic years for horror. You had vampire films and satanism and serial killers, environmental horror, you name it. Re-animator was another good horror/comedy from the 80s. I really disliked Slither though. Not to be confused with Slithis, which I cant say i have fond memories of either. |
January 9th, 2008, 05:42 PM | #78 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 141
|
Jonathan-
You're absolutely right in finding a parallel to the chick-flick. There are also some interesting queer elements in the film. Maybe I like it so much because it's so far from the prototypical crap horror of the '90s ('Bram Stoker's Dracula,' anyone?) There's a bit of the movie where it actually looks like Ripley is embracing the alien and possibly having sex with it! Freaky! |
January 9th, 2008, 05:47 PM | #79 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
Yes, 'Re-animator' should have made that list. One of the best. But how could you not like slither?! |
|
January 9th, 2008, 06:38 PM | #80 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 259
|
Yep I have a decent Vincent Price collection.
Theatre of Blood, Dr. Phibes Rises again, Madhouse and a few others. Masque of the Red Death was definitely a stand out Corman movie. I just felt Slither was limp and ripped too much from other films (Planet Terror was more energetic in a similar comedic vein IMO). Although a guy I knew from high school is in Slither so that might also be a factor. He was a bit of a jerk. Gets killed good though. Good riddance. Heh |
| ||||||
|
|