|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 28th, 2004, 04:02 PM | #61 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 48
|
i catch a lot of gruff for this, but i can't stand BLADE RUNNER.
and i'm a science fiction movie fan, and a big fan of Harrison Ford's early acting. i get the argument that it's "true" science fiction instead of "science fiction as the background for a story" (i.e. star wars, etc.) but i don't care how original the science fiction is. it's just a bad movie. bad writing, bad dialogue, bad acting, bad lots of stuff. (I also get that the main character's acting "should" be a little wooden, since the whole thing is an exploration of the fact that the humans are less human than the replicas...... WHATEVER) the only thing it has going for it in my opinion is great atmosphere. it has that in spades, but for the life of me, i cannot figure out why everyone thinks it's such a seminal science fiction film. YUK! |
April 29th, 2004, 07:44 PM | #62 |
Machinist Mate
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Connecticut
Posts: 644
|
"bowling for columbine"...simply awful in every way.
It is clear that the only reason it got the oscar in the documentary category is that Michael Moore is held in high political foavor by the members of the academy. It is not even a documentary, but a crude, deceptively edited low-quality diatribe with a "hate America first" agenda. I could be charitable and call it a satire or comedy, but that would be unfair to "This Is Spinal Tap" or "A Mighty Wind" or "Best In Show" which are truly funny mockumentaries.
__________________
I ain't straight outta Compton, I'm straight out the trailer. Cuss like a sailor, drink like a Mc. My only words of wisdom are just, "Radio Edit." |
April 29th, 2004, 07:49 PM | #63 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 427
|
I loved it.. Moore rules. ;-)
|
April 29th, 2004, 08:45 PM | #64 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
|
-Moore is infact full of it. i dont know why they havnt revoked his oscar.
I dont like Mulholland Drive, made absoloutly no sense to me, strangely enuf i liked lost highway. I thought mad max was long and boring. Matrix 2 and 3 are pathetic and they should rename matrix 2,"Matrix 2, The Exposition" Entropy , some film with stephen dorph. From Dusk till Dawn, - didnt like the way it went horror, but i dont like horror anyway. Spy kids 3 - need i say more Anything with puppets in it like Dark Crystal. Jackie Brown, supertroopers is not good too. |
April 30th, 2004, 01:09 PM | #65 |
Machinist Mate
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Connecticut
Posts: 644
|
"i dont know why they havnt revoked his oscar."
real simple, the same reason they gave it to him to begin with...the Hollyweird establishment sheeple who make these decisions all (mostly all) love his moronic bolshevik arse. They think like he does and share his radical politics, and it's real cool and hip to vilify America and Americans. And anyone in the film industry who dissents to this lockstep does so at the risk of his career. Whether the picture was good or awful (it's the latter) it is certainly not a documentary. Hell, by the standards they applied, Harry Potter is a documentary about English boarding schools! (hee hee) And even conceding the category, the film was not eligible for the award in the year it was granted, because its distribution timing was wrong to be nominated in that year. Oh well, more powerful people than me made this selection.
__________________
I ain't straight outta Compton, I'm straight out the trailer. Cuss like a sailor, drink like a Mc. My only words of wisdom are just, "Radio Edit." |
April 30th, 2004, 01:39 PM | #66 |
Air China Pilot
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 2,389
|
We had this debate a long time ago like after last year's Oscars. Please do a search and save us the trouble of dragging it out again.
__________________
-- Visit http://www.KeithLoh.com | stuff about living in Vancouver | My Flickr photo gallery |
April 30th, 2004, 02:11 PM | #67 |
Posts: n/a
|
Hmm. I loved Jackie Brown. What's not to like about that one?
|
April 30th, 2004, 04:51 PM | #68 |
Machinist Mate
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Connecticut
Posts: 644
|
Not a debate, just an attempt at a theory to solve Ben's mystery. And my guess is as good as anybody's. hahahaha
Now, the question from Kevin about Jackie Brown, that could be the opener of a debate. But I can't help you guys there, I haven't seen it. Actually, Joe has been kind enough to favor us with another thread for those who are fans of Columbine or Jackie (again, i don't know about that one) or any other steamers mentioned here, and it's called: "Movies you like but shouldn't have"... And I like Joe's rules: no flames, nobody is wrong or stupid, etc. Oh yes, and back to movies I hated, let's try Blair Witch Project.
__________________
I ain't straight outta Compton, I'm straight out the trailer. Cuss like a sailor, drink like a Mc. My only words of wisdom are just, "Radio Edit." |
April 30th, 2004, 07:22 PM | #69 |
Posts: n/a
|
No flame intended, I was just curious about what he didn't like with Jackie Brown. The lo-o-ng shots, the script, the acting, what? It's an unusual movie and there's lots of room for opinion. I agree that there are no right or wrong answers here.
|
April 30th, 2004, 07:57 PM | #70 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
|
Dunno just didnt like it.
Kill Bill was pretty damn good, cant wait to watch the sequal. My Fav Tarantino Films in Order. Four Rooms Kill Bill Reservoir Dogs Pulp Fiction Jackie Brown From Dusk till Dawn |
May 1st, 2004, 05:22 AM | #71 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 427
|
Tarantino didn't make From dusk to dawn. Only acted. That's Roberto Rodriguez.
Since he claims that Kill Bill was his fourth movie, I'm not sure what's the deal with Four Rooms either.. Anybody? |
May 1st, 2004, 05:51 AM | #72 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
|
He wrote the screen play.
|
May 1st, 2004, 06:05 AM | #73 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,933
|
Actually, Four Rooms had four directors and four screenwriters. Tarantino wrote and directed the "The Man from Hollywood" segment. Allison Anders, Alexandre Rockwell, and Robert Rodriguez wrote and directed "The Missing Ingredient," "The Wrong Man," and "The Misbehavers."
Drawing influence from other films (as in all his works), Tarantino looked to "The Man From Rio," an episode of Alfred Hitchcock Presents, which, in turn, finds its pedigree from the Roald Dahl short story "The Man from the South." This would explain Roald Dahl's credit in Four Rooms.
__________________
All the best, Robert K S Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | The best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
May 1st, 2004, 06:10 AM | #74 |
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
Hated Lord of the Things
I hated the first of the Tolkien's so much I wont see the others. Sorry. Too much, too often. Too visually rich for me. . . . I must be the only one on the Planet . . there again I loved Paris Texas and Rumble Fish.. . well, that figures I guess . . . oh yeah, loved Toy Story 1 . . .
|
May 1st, 2004, 04:15 PM | #75 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 32° 44' N 117° 10' W
Posts: 820
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Keith Loh : We had this debate a long time ago like after last year's Oscars. Please do a search and save us the trouble of dragging it out again. -->>>
? ? ? ? ? ? |
| ||||||
|
|