|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 19th, 2008, 04:21 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 426
|
God grew tired of us
Just watched the documentary about the lost boys of Sudan coming to America. Fantastic video. Had my 12 year old watch it too. One thing I was curious about. There were shots in the Brussels airport, the NYC airport, the Nairobi airport, on the planes as well as some shots on public streets in NYC and in supermarkets.
It looked like a fairly small scale production and I wondered if they really got permission to film all of those places and people or did they go guerilla style and hope for the best. |
December 19th, 2008, 07:52 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 3,840
|
My recollection is that it was guerilla style, run and gun in the airports.
|
December 19th, 2008, 02:17 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lanark,Scotland
Posts: 736
|
filmed in airports before, if you do it officially you need permission and in our case in scotland there is a $600 fee (which we got out of) presumably to pay for the PR person they give you to take you arround.
Otherwise you could use a regular civi cam and just look like a tourist By the way a bit of advice if your ever filming in an airport , do it at the check in desks behind the crowds cause there all looking forward to the checkin desk which means you drasticly reduce the amont of people looking at the camera. Andy
__________________
Actor: "where would that light be coming from?" DP: "same place as the music" -Andrew Lesnie- |
December 19th, 2008, 06:18 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 1,546
|
Didn't work for me, Andy - I tried to take a still photo of relatives at the check in at Glasgow Airport (you know, folks - the one with the drive through) and had hardly taken my Canon EOS 40D out the case when a nice gentleman with a badge suggested politely but firmly that I put it away again.
|
December 19th, 2008, 07:33 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 426
|
If it was shot guerilla style what's the risk of the airports and various pedestrians suing them etc.,? I'm very curious about this.
|
December 19th, 2008, 10:03 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 344
|
I think if the film has any real distribution agreements they (the producers/or production company/or distributor) MUST have Errors & Omissions Insurance (E&O), so they probably won’t worry about such things. E&O insurance provides protection against any future litigation.
In this case someone might raise an invasion of privacy issue. TV & Film Producers E&O
__________________
boxoutsidemedia.com |
December 20th, 2008, 12:58 PM | #7 | |
Panoramic
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 85
|
A Boy Named Sue
Quote:
On the second point, it used to be ok to film at airports, municipal buildings etc, but they all require permits now, since the film industry made them realize they could profit, and that film crews are huge and disruptive. They have no way to know that your little enterprise is not on the same scale. Even Mall's have adopted the policy. I was stopped from shooting at a mall in Tennessee with a point and shoot! (Location scout). If you can do it guerilla style, no tripod, maybe cradling the camera or shooting from inside concealment, you might consider that. The scene from the Bourne film where Matt Damon was in a european railroad station, was shot with camera concealed and from under the DP's clothing, to prevent people recognizing the star and gathering to watch. They probably had a permit to shoot from the railroad management, but no crew visible. Bon chance! iPaul
__________________
Paul Izbicki i2inewMedia |
|
May 6th, 2009, 07:28 PM | #8 |
Equal Opportunity Offender
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,064
|
Paul, is there a source article where we can read about the concealed shooting?
Andrew |
| ||||||
|
|