|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 9th, 2007, 01:11 PM | #16 |
JVC America
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 516
|
DR-HD100 helps a lot
All:
One of the best work-arounds in using HDV1 with Avid is to not deal with capturing tape at all. Shoot on the DR-HD100 hard drive. The .m2t files on the drive easily import into Avid. When importing, you choose one of the DNXHD codecs, and the .m2t files are transformed to DNXHD. For output, export to one of several HD formats, or burn to DVD-HD or Blur Ray.
__________________
Carl Hicks JVC Professional Products Company |
March 10th, 2007, 02:45 AM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 343
|
Yes, that's all very well if you're shooting 720p/30 but what about those of us in PAL land? There isn't even a 720p/25 project type yet, let alone native HDV1 support via firewire or data ingest from a Firestore. The only solid solution for us is the Convergent interface and for HD you have to cross-convert to 1080i and capture with at least MC Adrenaline with the HD option board. Sledgehammer to crack a nut, I'd say.
There's an Avid software update (AXPro through to Symph Nitris, as usual) due this month. I'll eat my hat if there's any HDV1 improvement in that release. |
March 10th, 2007, 07:25 AM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hobart, Australia
Posts: 41
|
Yeah word is 5.7 should be out in about a week and will include 720p50 as a project type but no HDV1 support as yet. I say "as yet" with this foolish tiny amount of hope remaining that they will one day wake up and smell the JVC userbase.
|
March 10th, 2007, 07:36 AM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 590
|
As will I. There really is no chance though, from what I have heard. Pathetic really. NAB will mark two years of Avid promising HDV1 support. Two years. Pathetic.
|
March 10th, 2007, 04:40 PM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 789
|
Quote:
It should be possible because in MPEG streamclip, all of the DNXHD options are in Quicktime. I know Firestore offers OMF recording, but if I'm not mistaken, DNXHD are all MXF file formats. So, they would have to use MXF. I'm just thinking out loud.
__________________
David Parks: DP/Editor: Jacobs Aerospace at NASA Johnson Space Center https://www.youtube.com/user/JacobsESCG |
|
March 10th, 2007, 04:45 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 343
|
Yeah, DNx encoding direct to disk would be great but the data rate is probably too high for a single drive for the mastering codecs - it's equivalent to around uncompressed SD. Still, it would be great. The DNx codec is the only remaining reason I'm prepared to wait it out a bit longer. The Canopus HQ and HD codecs aren't bad but IMHO not close to DNx. For HDV acquisition, DNx is much more than good enough, I'd say.
|
March 10th, 2007, 05:05 PM | #22 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 789
|
Quote:
Maybe JVC can get Firestore and Avid to sit down and draw this up. I mean certainly Firestore has a lot to gain. Am I looking through rose-colored glasses??? Probably.
__________________
David Parks: DP/Editor: Jacobs Aerospace at NASA Johnson Space Center https://www.youtube.com/user/JacobsESCG |
|
March 11th, 2007, 05:52 AM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 590
|
I don't think the Firestore will be able to do this in it's current condition. Remeber, with the .MOV update, all it is doing is "Wrapping" the HDV file into a .MOV file, not transcoding it. DNxHD is entirely different, and would involve a complete transcode.
|
March 11th, 2007, 09:20 AM | #24 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 789
|
Quote:
__________________
David Parks: DP/Editor: Jacobs Aerospace at NASA Johnson Space Center https://www.youtube.com/user/JacobsESCG |
|
March 11th, 2007, 08:20 PM | #25 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 706
|
Quote:
So, yes, you are right, this is not a solution, not even a workaround. It's absurd and very frustrating that other (sometimes lesser software) can do it, yet Avid can't. Keep banging at Avid's door....I do too.
__________________
www.ascentfilms.com |
|
March 14th, 2007, 07:23 AM | #26 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edison, New Jersey
Posts: 13
|
"MOS" Mit-on-sound or Man-on-street?
I am presuming mit-on-sound. As, for the clips that imported with the error, all audio drifts out of sync. Focus acknowledge the issue, as does Avid - but no fix yet. |
March 15th, 2007, 09:26 PM | #27 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 706
|
Mit on sound - yes. While capturing, sometimes the record window in Avid would be skipping frames or freezing them every now and then but the captured clip was fine. Other times the capture would abort half way through and I would have to make the clips shorter in order to get them in. Yes, there is no solution yet, perhaps 5.7 will change that.
__________________
www.ascentfilms.com |
March 17th, 2007, 04:29 AM | #28 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
The story I heard was that MOS was "Mit out sound" from an old German director's mispronunciation of "With".
Makes a good story, anyway... |
March 17th, 2007, 08:56 AM | #29 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edison, New Jersey
Posts: 13
|
Heard back from Avid engineering - they are receiving an FS4ProHD from Focus on Monday and will begin testing. The thought is that the FS4ProHD records .m2t files differently than the FS100 (which is approved by Avid). According to Focus the file record is no different between the two drives.
So, Avid is moving forwards - slowly, but moving forwards. |
March 19th, 2007, 02:06 PM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 706
|
Yeah, you are right...I heard the same story, now that you reminded me...:-) I guess it would be the most plausible of the urban legends out there.
__________________
www.ascentfilms.com |
| ||||||
|
|