|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 7th, 2012, 08:38 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rolling Hills Estates, CA
Posts: 35
|
image stabilization: MC5.5 vs MC 6.0
Does anyone here know whether the image stabilizer (region stabilize et al) in MC 6.0 is any better than in 5.5? The results in 5.5 are incomprehensibly poor. If there is no difference, do we know whether Avid intentionally downgraded stabilization performance in the 5.x series, and if so, why? At one time, I thought "regions stabilize" was a great quick fix for relatively minor issues over short spans of time, but no more.
Thanks for your thoughts. Tom |
|
|
|
January 25th, 2012, 07:34 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Yeppoon, Queensland
Posts: 332
|
Re: image stabilization: MC5.5 vs MC 6.0
Id say because the "Region Stabilize" hasn't been developed any further while "Stabilize" is what you probably should be using as that has been working extremely well for me, there is a lot more Stabilize can do as well.
|
|
|
|
|
January 30th, 2012, 11:46 PM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rolling Hills Estates, CA
Posts: 35
|
Re: image stabilization: MC5.5 vs MC 6.0
Thanks, Peter. Will follow your suggestion next time the need arises. -- Tom
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
