|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#61 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 431
|
Quote:
Hey check this out!!! VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO PLATINUM 9 free at Fry's this week. Price: $ 70.00 After Rebate: $ 0.00
__________________
"Get Er Done!!!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 431
|
Quote:
Case and point: Joe the plumber wants to take videos of his kids. He picks up a standard apple iMac. He uses the editing program included, iMovie. The salesman talks him into the latest technology an AVCHD camcorder. He takes it home films his kids at the park and their piano recital. When he sits down to edit it all hell breaks loose! Nothing works right... He gets a tip to join DVinfo.net, and learns that he can't have the 'run of the mill' computer with his new camera. He needs a top of the line 8 core with tons of ram! That is the experience the average consumer is having. The only happy customers are those with higher end professional set ups.
__________________
"Get Er Done!!!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 63
|
When I see the problems my friend has with a Mac and I Movie I'm glad I stayed with XP, his m/c is a dual core 2.2 GHz but it won't load AVCHD off my HF10.
I use a Core 2 Duo 3Hhz and Video Studio Pro X2 and stay with AVCHD 1920x1080 through out as any conversion loses definition, the only thing I use is Proxy Files to help with the editing, and then a bit of patience waiting for the final rendering, in my case about 8 times real time, but the outcome is worth the wait as the quality of the final video is so close to the original it is just about impossible to pick. If you go back to the early days of video editing 8x real time would have seemed lightening fast, after all the editing is what takes the time the rendering is nothing in comparison, so having quad core might be nice but is only of any significant benefit to the final render. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Quote:
Ron Evans |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 431
|
I understand your point but we'll have to agree to disagree on the Mac/PC issue. Although averages lean towards the PC that doesn't mean that it doesn't happen often for MAC users.
__________________
"Get Er Done!!!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Quote:
If you want to do a lot of editing and have no computer the choice would be a PC providing a lower cost way of getting the needed power and having a wider choice of software including the software that comes with most AVCHD cameras that is normally PC based. I have no bias PC or MAC this is just the way it is at the moment. Buy the tool that meets the need. Ron Evans |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Winnipeg Canada
Posts: 68
|
If you're planning on doing a lot of avchd editing and even getting into Blu Ray the Mac is not the way to go. Mac is behind the times in this department. You can do it but it's not nearly as efficient.
Apple sided with HD DVD and Toshiba/Microsoft during the format war and has still not fully adjusted to the way of blu ray as of yet. In fact there is still a question as to whether or not they ever will. If you're working with avi, HDV.... etc then a mac will do ya', but avchd and Blu Ray.... PC is the way to go. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|