|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 26th, 2005, 10:37 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: World wide
Posts: 77
|
XL-H1 little sister GL/XM "3"...?
XL-H1 little sister GL/XM "3"...?
Are there any news on the way: GL/XM "3"? Have not heard anything in a loooong while. All the best Carl |
|
|
|
November 27th, 2005, 08:49 AM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 888
|
They must have a lot of GL2 sitting around.
|
|
|
|
|
November 27th, 2005, 12:44 PM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Granada, Spain
Posts: 75
|
If an HD lens runs about 12K Bucks people will realize itīs not an option for them, so if Canon puts an XM3 with HDV before or little after their big one, they will kill some of their sales and maybe hit their XL2 as well...
0ī02 cents.
__________________
IvI |
|
|
|
|
December 15th, 2005, 02:47 PM
|
#4 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 1,034
|
Not if the XL H1 and GL H1 are targeted at different markets.
|
|
|
|
|
December 17th, 2005, 08:17 PM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Granada, Spain
Posts: 75
|
If you mean different markets the ones that donīt need the HDMI output (the most people, who will use HDV) and some broadcasters and indie filmakers that will use it, then itīs possible that will happen the same thing anyway.
If you are stuck with HDV, you will be stuck with the stock lens and you wonīt need HDMI. So you will buy the GL (that is basically what i just wrote). Maybe itīs better for Canon to offer just the XL-H1 right now and get the customers that will say: Oh, well...
__________________
IvI |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
