|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 3rd, 2004, 09:33 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 25
|
New version?
We're about due for a Premiere Pro update. Any word on when? I'm an experienced Premiere 6.0 user and want to begin HD production. Also wondering if Vegas is easy for Premiere users to pick up. Thanks.
|
December 3rd, 2004, 11:45 AM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eagle River, AK
Posts: 4,100
|
I have absolutely NO "inside" knowledge at all; just an end user. My memory may be failing a bit, but I tink that PPro 1.5 just came out this spring (2004) and there's been rumor/talk of a free HDV add-on in the near future. So I'd be a little surprised if a new version was imminent. But ya never know!
__________________
Pete Bauer The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. Albert Einstein Trying to solve a DV mystery? You may find the answer behind the SEARCH function ... or be able to join a discussion already in progress! |
December 3rd, 2004, 12:14 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester and Kent, UK
Posts: 256
|
I spent about an hour on Vegas the other day (I've been using Premiere since around version 5.0) and I just couldn't get my head around the interface and the way of editing.
I found Avid easier to pick up. Best stick with Premiere Pro. None of that silly weird Vegas stuff :D
__________________
Richard Lewis. Steadicam Owner / Operator |
December 3rd, 2004, 01:06 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 25
|
Thanks for the input. I've read a lot about what's out there. Everything's got goods and bads. Premiere is a lot like Avid which was the first NLE I worked with in the TV biz. I'm probably sticking with PP, especially for the color correction and Photoshop interfacing.
|
December 3rd, 2004, 03:11 PM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
The HDV plugin was promised for this year. They need to hurry.
I don't expect a new version of Premiere Pro in the next 6 months. They have to coordinate with the other three applications in the collection. And people complained that eight months between releases was too short. They didn't want to pay. But Adobe never announces until the master CD is on it's way to the duplication house. |
December 3rd, 2004, 03:22 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 25
|
Valuable info, Steven. I plan on upgrading my whole computer system in January. I've gotten some great ideas from DV Info Net and the manufacturers' websites. I'm happy with the Adobe family of products so I'll probably stick with them. Sounds like 3.0 ghz Pentiums with 1 gb RAM are what's working. Do you really not need a capture card with Premiere or did I hallucinate that?
|
December 3rd, 2004, 11:08 PM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
I stopped using a capture card when I started using Premiere Pro. Now I use just a 1394 firewire card.
One of these days I really need to get around to selling my DVStorm2 I guess. Unless they make it useful for the new Sony HDR-FX1 I am planning on ordering this weekend. |
December 4th, 2004, 09:47 AM | #8 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eagle River, AK
Posts: 4,100
|
Same as Steven. I used a DVRaptor card until PPro, and decided against dropping the $$ on another card at the time. The Canopus codec always gets rave reviews, but I've been perfectly happy using firewire through the motherboard's onboard 1394 port. Maybe if I did multiple generations of rendering, it would matter a little more, but typically using 1 or 2 renders to reach final product, I don't notice a difference.
As far as PPro goes, for Adobe users I think it is a great upgrade. I see posts where people complain about PPro being slow, or this or that, but I LOVE PPro 1.5, along with the rest of the Video Collection Pro package. Virtually any irritations I had from previous versions of PPro seem to be gone. My video editing system has an Intel 875 chipset, 3.0GHz P4, 2GB DDR (and 1GB would be fine unless you're using multiple apps simultaneously, or heavy-duty AE stuff) and multiple hard disks ... while there's no such thing as a "too fast" computer, PPro on this computer does the job nicely for me.
__________________
Pete Bauer The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. Albert Einstein Trying to solve a DV mystery? You may find the answer behind the SEARCH function ... or be able to join a discussion already in progress! |
December 4th, 2004, 04:49 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 25
|
Thanks for the info! I'll be interested in hearing how the new HDV camera works. I've never had a Premiere speed problem. I'll probably stick with PP because I'm old and I don't have a lot of time to learn new stuff. :-|>
|
December 4th, 2004, 05:06 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
Well, I am over 50, and keeping up with the young-uns is tough, but worth it, I think.
When I recorded the Premiere Pro 1.5 tutorials at http://www.lynda.com, I was surrounded by much younger people. But being up-to-date on a product, maybe even a little ahead of the curve, gave us some interesting common ground. Of course, the funny part is that they edited my tutorials on Premiere Pro using a Mac, and Final Cu Pro! Once I get the camcorder I will start posting more about it on my site. Check out http://www.stevengotz.com/premiere and watch for the newest info after we get back from shooting vacation footage in Hawaii this Christmas. In the meantime, I think you will find plenty to look at now. |
January 18th, 2005, 02:15 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Munich Germany
Posts: 31
|
Adobe is currently betaing the HD plug in for PPRo.
http://www.wrigleyvideo.com/forum/in...ndpost&p=84495
__________________
Gone Fishing. If you need me, please wait! If it is important, please wait longer. |
| ||||||
|
|