|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 58
|
Video tutorial - Building vibrating DoF adapter added!
Hi guys,
I had a little spare time and did a video tutorial on how to build a basic vibrating DoF adapter in 5 easy steps! That should help those people who needs some basic information and dont want to go through thousands of posts. If someone has new ideas to implement in that tutorial just mail me. You can download the video-tutorial from my homepage. See the tutorials section. And of course its all for free!!! have fun Daniel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sevilla (Spain)
Posts: 439
|
Great Daniel! Let me be the first one to say thank you very much for the effort.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 195
|
Wow, extremely cool of you. A must see for all beginners.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 58
|
If someone is interested I searched for the parts and prices in ebay that you will need to build this dof adapter.
Here are some actual prices from ebay: 2x 10,- (Macro-extension tubes) 2x 6,- (55mm UV-Filter HMC Multicoated) 1x 40,- (Canon Ee-A screen) 1x 60,- (VH-57 + new black mamba motor) http://www.jetsetmodels.info/vibrating.htm 1x 1,- (coiled phonecable) 1x 8,- (Nikon to Canon EOS adapter) Parts from ebay without shipping: USD 141,- For lens try a 50mm Nikon 1:1.4 (ebay approx. USD 200,-) For beginning you can also try a 50mm 1:1.8 (ebay approx. USD 50-100,-) Have fun Daniel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hungary / Europe
Posts: 128
|
hi Daniel,
thanks for the list! what the better screen : nikon F3 D or the Canon Ee-A ? please tell your experiences ;) thanks
__________________
Robert Batta my stock video portfolio : https://www.pond5.com/artist/skysuta Pond5 – the world’s first web-based stock footage marketplace – |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 58
|
Hi Robert,
personally I prefer the Canon Ee-A screen because its much brighter and you can use it also indoor with little lighting. The downside of this screen is that you can see some weird patterns in the highlights of the footage when the sun is pointing into your lens the same happens also with the Ee-S. The Nikon D is ok but its not that bright and hard to get nowadays. Downside of this screen dust can enter between its pcx lens and matte screen. Then you have to take it appart and clean it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Trustee
|
I worked with the D screen for a while, it does work and has solid diffusion properties. The Canon Ee screens don't diffuse the correct way, in my opinion.
__________________
BenWinter.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,121
|
Daniel, many thanks for the time and effort. It looks great.
With your i-35HD- why are you not using an achromat? Last edited by David Delaney; June 26th, 2007 at 01:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orinda, CA
Posts: 15
|
Great website man. Thanks for the effort.
Had you tried the adaptor with a Sony pd150? Does it work OK with or without the achromat? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|