|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 13th, 2007, 08:32 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntington, WV
Posts: 260
|
Lens description for Letus Nikkor
I do not mean to sound stupid, though I am when it comes to lenses, but if a lens is advertised as F1.8 Als, I know the 1.8 is to do with amount of light required, but what is the Als? When purchasing my Nikkor lenses, anything else in particular I should look for? J
|
May 13th, 2007, 09:38 PM | #2 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
AIS (Automatic Index - Shutter) Lens_ If there is a machined groove (Lens Type Signal Notch) in the base of the lens, you have an AIS, Series E, or Auto Focus (AF) lens. The purpose of the groove was to let the camera body know that aperture stop down was linear.Your camera can take advantage of AIS if it has a protruding pin on the camera lens mounting ring. If the pin is not on the camera body, it can't take advantage of the AIS feature, but the lens will operate as AI. |
|
May 13th, 2007, 10:46 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntington, WV
Posts: 260
|
Steve, you are the best. Thanks. J
|
May 13th, 2007, 10:51 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntington, WV
Posts: 260
|
One more question then, is the 1.4 better than the 1.8?
|
May 13th, 2007, 11:48 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 49
|
We would need to know which 2 lenses you are comparing.
Generally speaking, yes it is better - and propably costs four times as much. For same focal length primes (85mm f/1.4 vs 85mm f/1.8 for example) the 1.4 will most likely be sharper at same apertures and have more pleasing bokeh (rendering of out-of-focus). This added sharpness may not be visible due to the adapter ground glass, the XH-A1 stock lens and the resolving power of the XH-A1 sensor. The larger aperture will be of little use with a 35mm adapter, the depth of field at 1.4 is so shallow it's virtually useless. Unless you have a high-end Nikon DSLR and alot of money to spend I would say stick with the 1.8. For lens reviews check: http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/ http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/ |
May 14th, 2007, 07:56 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntington, WV
Posts: 260
|
What exactly is the NON-AI lense? thanks. J
|
May 14th, 2007, 12:39 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntington, WV
Posts: 260
|
I figured out the AI and NON AI. I bought a 1.4 on the 50mm, so am I understanding correctly that this will not be a good lens for video? I got such a good deal I thought I had better buy it. I thought f1.4 would be better than 1.8 since it was better in low light. I didn't know that would make the depth of field that much more shallow. So I should get a 1.8 50mm? Thanks. J
|
May 14th, 2007, 01:24 PM | #8 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
1.4 2 2.8 4 5.6 8 11 16 22 |
|
May 14th, 2007, 01:41 PM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
The 1.4 is better in low light, but only at f/1.4 - at the cost of a very shallow depth of field. Once stopped down to f/1.8 it will let in the same amount of light as 1.8 at f/1.8 and have the same depth of field. It will however be sharper and most likely have slightly better color reproduction and more pleasing bokeh. |
|
May 14th, 2007, 04:43 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntington, WV
Posts: 260
|
Great! Thanks. J
|
| ||||||
|
|