|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 26th, 2007, 02:10 AM | #61 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 320
|
I was a bit late downloading this.. Brilliant as always Steven. The music works really well too.
|
April 26th, 2007, 12:23 PM | #62 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 97
|
Wow.... really, Wow.
Steven, you mentioned what lenses you used. Is it fair to assume that the order you listed them is the same order you shot with for this piece? |
April 26th, 2007, 09:09 PM | #63 |
Disjecta
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 937
|
Not really DJ. You can judge the extreme closeups with the very narrow depth of field were shot with the 100mm, the long shots were shot with the 28mm and the medium and medium/close shots were with the 50mm (for the most part, there maybe some variations, I just don't remember)
__________________
Try my Digital Therapy: http://www.pinelakefilms.com/digital_therapy.html Films on ExposureRoom: http://exposureroom.com/members/disjecta.aspx/videos/ |
May 17th, 2007, 09:10 PM | #64 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 153
|
Hi Steven,
Just curious what kind of support do you use for the letus. If there is no support wouldn;t it damage the thread on your A1? thanks ys Quote:
|
|
May 17th, 2007, 09:35 PM | #65 |
Disjecta
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 937
|
I don't use any support because the lenses I use are small and relatively light. I think the whole thing, including the lens is about 1.25lbs. With a bigger lens, I would definitely use support.
__________________
Try my Digital Therapy: http://www.pinelakefilms.com/digital_therapy.html Films on ExposureRoom: http://exposureroom.com/members/disjecta.aspx/videos/ |
May 18th, 2007, 10:07 AM | #66 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hoboken, NJ (New York metro area)
Posts: 105
|
Hey Steve, outstanding work. I've enjoyed watching all of your films.
I've also shot with the Letus Flip enhanced on my FX1. The biggest thing I notice in your footage is the same thing I saw in mine - the texture of the ground glass always seems to be there. It isn't terrible and is almost a stylistic thing but I sold my letus and bought a Brevis. I think you should try and check out a Brevis if you get the chance. The Brevis is MUCH BETTER. The ground glass in the Brevis completely disappears, no grain, no texture of the ground glass. And it loses a whole lot less light. And it's constructed much better (not plastic). And it runs off a rechargeable battery. I could keep adding Ands. |
May 18th, 2007, 04:49 PM | #67 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami, Florida, USA
Posts: 479
|
Quote:
Seriously the all have their plus and minus.
__________________
Douglas Villalba - director/cinematographer/editor Miami, Florida, USA - www.DVtvPRODUCTIONS.com |
|
May 18th, 2007, 05:09 PM | #68 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
I had wanted to go with the Brevis, just because it looked more, hmmm, classy, but buying the Letus handyman special at $375 with the combo Nikon/Canon mount was just too tempting, and my first months fun with it made it worth the risk....I am shooting it with the HV20 and FX1, and it is working well with both.... With HV20 flip the whole camera with a device I made that is mountable on a tripod, and that works out flip issues, mostly....
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
May 18th, 2007, 05:33 PM | #69 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami, Florida, USA
Posts: 479
|
By the way I don't know if you heard that the M2 is coming out with a flip.
I saw it at NAB in the Panasonic booth and it looked really good.
__________________
Douglas Villalba - director/cinematographer/editor Miami, Florida, USA - www.DVtvPRODUCTIONS.com |
May 18th, 2007, 10:11 PM | #70 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hoboken, NJ (New York metro area)
Posts: 105
|
I've owned both. Paying more for Brevis is the difference between home-made and professional. Brevis is much better in every respect but most importantly Brevis produces a better image. The Flip enhanced is brutal with light loss (and $700 vs. $1000 isn't a huge difference in price). With Letus I had to shoot everything wide open and I was still stretching my lighting package. Flipping the image in post is super easy and options to flip during capture are more common. Flipping is just not a meaningful feature to me. Plus you can always shoot with the camera upside down and then your image will correct if it's such a big deal to you. Losing a whole stop more of light is a huge price to pay for such a simple convience. But the texture of the ground glass on the image is the deal breaker for me. With Brevis there is no texture and hardly any light loss - less than a stop. The letus flip enhanced loses at least two stops and I'd rate it 2.5 stops of light. Losing less light makes Brevis so much easier to shoot with.
Everything is a trade off, but there is no question that Brevis produces a better image. And I bought my Brevis used. I got the Brevis, the Red Rock Macro, the Cinevate rails, & 2 lenses for $800. |
May 18th, 2007, 11:07 PM | #71 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 153
|
Hi Nathan,
Just wondering will we be able to handhold the camera plus brevis setup during filming? say i am using a small 50mm lens? if i do not use rail support will i risk damaging the camera's thread? thanks ys Quote:
|
|
May 18th, 2007, 11:12 PM | #72 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hoboken, NJ (New York metro area)
Posts: 105
|
No you won't damage the threads. You don't need rails with the Brevis. It's very run and gun friendly especially with small lenses like a 50mm.
|
May 19th, 2007, 01:21 AM | #73 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 153
|
wow that means with the brevis HD bundle i am ready to start filming?
One last question which may sound silly... that is can i still use the zoom in my camera when i have such adapters attached? Or i must follow some rules like it should always be set to the widest? Thanks yslee |
May 19th, 2007, 08:09 AM | #74 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hoboken, NJ (New York metro area)
Posts: 105
|
Quote:
While the image is not as sharp as your camera's stock lens, as you can see from Steven's fine example video in this thread, the image is nothing like video anymore. If you want the film look - this is it. |
|
May 19th, 2007, 10:20 AM | #75 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
| ||||||
|
|