|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 3rd, 2006, 02:39 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 96
|
wich difuser is better?
i've always thought it was beattie
but i've been hearing about POC which one is better? whata are the diferences? |
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2006, 03:14 AM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Brighton, East Sussex, UK
Posts: 938
|
I would say in a static adapter the beattie is best as the POC is too grainy, however, the bokeh from the beattie is not so good.
I think most have had best luck from the Nikon D screen or the Canon Ee-s Screen
__________________
Thanks, Wayne. |
|
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2006, 05:12 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tartu, Estonia
Posts: 579
|
By my observations Canon EE-A and EE-S microlens focusing screens are one of the best not to mention they are almost 3x cheaper than Beattie.
I have EE-A OEM screen sample and EE-S consumer version and I think that OEM version is not so good as the consumer one as that OEM EE-A screen loses more light than EE-S but according to Canon`s specification sheet it should be vice versa. I`m 95% sure that Beattie isn`t better than modern microlens screens from Canon. Regs, T |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
