GG and Bokeh - Page 3 at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Alternative Imaging Methods
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Alternative Imaging Methods
DV Info Net is the birthplace of all 35mm adapters.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 28th, 2006, 08:38 PM   #31
New Boot
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Amsterdam , Netherlands
Posts: 22
if you were just taling about lenses for a minute then a lense that gives you good bokeh (say a 58mm f1.4 minolta rokkor ) will generally give a less sharp image on the other hand a sharper lens has slightly poorer bokeh , however the difference is slight. This might have something to do with the fact that to get a shallow DOF and nice bokeh out of a lense you generally have to have the appeture wide open , when a lenses focal sweet spot as it were is somewhere around f5.6 . Again when taling just about a lense ( before complicating things with diffussion) there is an artistic choice between sharpness and nicer bokeh. I agree that the best focusing screen would be able to best emulate what happens on the film plane in an slr camera ( I say best because I also agree that it would be near impossible to exactly replicate what happens on film)
rob
Robert Gradisen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2006, 08:48 PM   #32
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 103
I've compared my adapter footage to film shots on SLR with the same lens (50mm f1.2 Nikkor). On 100ASA and 400ASA film (surprisingly to me) the dynamic range is absolute crap by comparison, bright areas are blown out, dark areas are too dark in the same shot, bokeh is grainy and highlights have a bright edge classed as bad bokeh.

However on the adapter footage the dynamic range is good, and because the gg doesn't fully diffuse it actually softens the bokeh somewhat and the result is it looks better than actual film haha!
Andy Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2006, 09:15 PM   #33
New Boot
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Amsterdam , Netherlands
Posts: 22
hey andy
sorry I havent replied yet to the last email you sent me lifes a little hectic at the moment , how did you go with wax , if you are using wax ,I noticed that depending on exposure I still get slight hotspotting and occasionally the grain is evident but mostly not, haven got any decent footage to show as everything ive got has been deinterlaced and colour and gamma corrected and would probably not accurately demonstrate the ability of the adapter
rob
Robert Gradisen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2006, 09:20 PM   #34
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 103
I'm oscillating 40 micron gg at the mo, wouldn't go back to wax unless you tell me bees wax can give light loss around 1-1.5 stops total loss for the system.

I always correct my footage anyway so I'd still like to see "doctored" grabs.
Andy Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 29th, 2006, 07:21 PM   #35
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,675
Images: 1
This was shot on the Letus35 with a theatrical lighting gel diffuser switched out with the focusing screen. The footage is great, but there was too much grain even with the vibration. I'm sorry I can't find my sorenson serial number so I was stuck with the trial, hence the watermark. But you still get the idea.

http://www.frozenphoenixproductions....ffusertest.mov
__________________
BenWinter.com

Last edited by Ben Winter; June 29th, 2006 at 08:36 PM.
Ben Winter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 29th, 2006, 07:35 PM   #36
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec (Canada)
Posts: 133
Ben, the link does not work for me (Page not found).
__________________
François
Francois Poitras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 29th, 2006, 08:17 PM   #37
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,675
Images: 1
Sadly ever since Powweb went under new management they moved everybody to a new system and with it, new rules. You'll notice you can no longer browse my exposed directories, they're blocked. I think another dumb rule they put in is no direct file linking--which is going to be a serious problem for me since I link to files all the time. I'll see if I can fix the problem.

EDIT: problem solved. I was uploading to the old server. Link should work when the upload finishes.
__________________
BenWinter.com
Ben Winter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 29th, 2006, 08:53 PM   #38
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,675
Images: 1
I should also mention that the R8 leica focusing screen is a fantastic gg but has a dumb split-prism in the middle. What a bummer.
__________________
BenWinter.com
Ben Winter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 30th, 2006, 03:44 PM   #39
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,675
Images: 1
The Nikon D100 replacement screen I ordered is exactly what I hoped for. Small, but a fantastic image, very similar in construction to the Beattie Intenscreen for the Contax. It doesn't really diffuse completely to my satisfaction, but the bokeh is different than the Beattie from what I can tell, hopefully better. There's practically nil grain. I'm installing it in my Letus and I'll have test footage shortly.
__________________
BenWinter.com
Ben Winter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 30th, 2006, 04:10 PM   #40
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Brighton, East Sussex, UK
Posts: 938
Ben,
Sounds great, be sure to show us some footage!
__________________
Thanks,
Wayne.
Wayne Kinney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 30th, 2006, 08:53 PM   #41
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,675
Images: 1
D100 Results - No Light Loss, No Grain, Horrendous Bokeh

Alright,
The D100 shows great lack of light loss, great lack of grain, and the in-focus material is the sharpest I've ever seen. But the bokeh is pretty undesirable. I'll let the results speak for themselves.

http://www.frozenphoenixproductions..../d100test1.mov
http://www.frozenphoenixproductions..../d100test2.mov
http://www.frozenphoenixproductions..../d100test3.mov

Check em out.
__________________
BenWinter.com
Ben Winter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 30th, 2006, 10:06 PM   #42
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 103
Hey Ben

You might want to try sticking two of your diffusers together face to face. You'll get the bokeh you want but possibly at the expense of sharpness and grain.
Andy Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1st, 2006, 10:44 AM   #43
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,675
Images: 1
I was going to try that--I think I'll find some less powerful diffuser gel material and glue it up against the D100 screen.
__________________
BenWinter.com
Ben Winter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1st, 2006, 10:50 AM   #44
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 101
What about the D200s screen? lol stupid question - i dont think it will make any difference, its just the next model
__________________
(Wishes to be more informative and helpful than a nuisance)
Tim Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 4th, 2006, 11:50 AM   #45
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ventura, California, USA
Posts: 751
Ben, how about shooting some out-of focus-lights at night?
Bill Porter is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Alternative Imaging Methods


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network