|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 31st, 2006, 10:25 PM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 108
|
I'd go with the Nattress set - re:vision fileds kit is good - but nattress is i think just as good and a great all round set of filters.
-j |
April 5th, 2006, 07:50 AM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Barca Spain
Posts: 384
|
jim,
for PC absolutely best free tool is Virtual Dub or Virtual Dub Mod. Magic Bullet and Reelsmart are of cause over the top but they're not so far from vdub. http://www.virtualdub.org/ http://virtualdubmod.sourceforge.net/ |
April 5th, 2006, 09:14 AM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 94
|
just shake it a bit
from what i've seen: Apple's Shake.
|
April 5th, 2006, 01:34 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 636
|
Which filters with VDubMod, though?
__________________
Realism, anyway, is never exactly the same as reality, and in the cinema it is of necessity faked. -- J-L G |
April 10th, 2006, 01:52 AM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Barca Spain
Posts: 384
|
Quote:
|
|
April 10th, 2006, 02:45 AM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 45
|
http://neuron2.net/smart/smart.html
This one works quite nicely when there isn't too much fast movement involved. Way better than normal deinterlacing. |
April 10th, 2006, 11:49 AM | #22 | ||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
I prefer FieldsKit among the expensive ones, I also know that it in fact is used a lot by professionals. Download some different plugins and compare the results. Aplparysoft deinterlacer as I mentioned earlier gives very good results for its price, nearly as good as FieldsKit. I haven't tried Nattress or Magic Bullet but from what I've read, they both give good results. Quote:
__________________
http://www.nattvard.com |
||
| ||||||
|
|